get_queue_user_access

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already establishes this is a safe read, and the description adds nothing beyond that — no note on whether inherited/group permissions are included, no permission requirements, no indication of what fields the permission set contains. The description carries no behavior beyond the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is concise but borders on under-specification rather than efficient density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter lookup tool with no output schema and no annotation detail beyond readOnly, the description omits the queueId definition, the shape of the returned permission set, and how it relates to sibling access tools. An agent could call it, but with avoidable ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 50%: userId has a description ('Login or user id') but queueId is undocumented. The description supplies no parameter meaning at all, so it fails to compensate for the schema gap as required at low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb+resource: fetching user permissions scoped to a queue. It does not distinguish itself from near siblings such as get_queue_group_access or get_entity_permissions, which an agent would need to choose between, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus get_queue_group_access, get_entity_access, or get_entity_permissions. The description gives no context or exclusions, so the agent must infer selection from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.