dooray_post_log_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits. 'Add a comment' describes the side effect but does not reveal the need for the 'operation' parameter set to 'create_log', authentication expectations, error behavior, or response format. The description adds minimal transparency beyond the name itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no filler. It front-loads the action and target, making it immediately scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should compensate by explaining the full invocation context. It does not mention the required operation constant, how to obtain projectId/postId, or what the API returns on success/failure. The description alone is insufficient for an agent to confidently invoke this create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75%, and the schema already provides descriptions for projectId, postId, body.content, and body.mimeType. The description does not add parameter semantics, such as explaining that postId refers to the target post or how to construct the body object. Since the schema covers most parameters, a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'add a comment to a Dooray post' uses a specific verb ('add') and identifies the resource ('comment' to a 'Dooray post'). It clearly distinguishes this create operation from sibling tools like dooray_post_log_update (update) and dooray_post_logs (list). The only minor ambiguity is the term 'comment' vs 'log' in the name, but the action is still unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only states the action without mentioning that listing or updating logs is handled by sibling tools, or any prerequisites like needing a existing post ID. Usage must be inferred entirely from the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.