dooray_post_log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. The verb 'find' unambiguously indicates a read-only operation, giving the agent confidence there are no side effects. However, it does not mention permissions, error conditions, or return format, which are left unspecified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of only 9 words, fully front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word contributes meaning, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, well-parameterized get-by-id tool, the description is mostly complete. The schema covers all parameter meanings. The lack of an output schema is offset by the natural expectation that a 'find' returns the log. No critical context is missing given the low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., logId can be a comment id).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('find') and the resource ('a specific comment or activity log of a Dooray post'). It explicitly scopes to a single log, distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'dooray_post_logs' which presumably lists logs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies use for retrieving a specific log, but does not state when to prefer it over listing tools or create/update variants.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.