admin_injects_get_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the White team access requirement, but it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or describe potential side effects or response structure. The behavior is inferred from 'Get', but key safety details are left to the user's assumption.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys both the action and access restriction with no filler. It is maximally concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter list operation, the description provides the essential information: it returns all template assignments and is restricted to White team. While it does not explicitly say it returns a list, 'Get all' and the plural noun make this clear, and there is no output schema to explain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema confirms this. With no parameters to describe, the description does not need to add parameter semantics; the baseline of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'Get' and the resource 'all inject templates' with team assignments, distinguishing it from the singular 'admin_injects_get_template' sibling. It also notes the access restriction (White team only), making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states who can use the tool (White team only) but does not explicitly explain when to use this tool versus the singular template getter or other inject tools. Usage is implied by the 'all' and plural resource, but no direct comparison to alternatives is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.