admin_injects_get_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the 'White team only' access restriction, which is useful behavioral context. However, it does not mention potential errors (e.g., template not found), permission specifics, or any side effects, though for a simple read operation this is less critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, immediately stating the core action and the access constraint. No wasted words, and the key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one required parameter, no output schema), and the description plus schema fully convey what the tool does. The sibling context (admin_injects_get_templates for listing) materially disambiguates this singular-get function. A small gap is lack of detail about what 'details' includes, but that is not essential for invoking the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the only parameter template_id with a clear description ('ID of the template'), achieving 100% coverage. The tool description adds little beyond the schema, only contextualizing it as a 'specific' template, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Get' with the resource 'specific inject template details', clearly distinguishing it from the sibling tool admin_injects_get_templates (plural) which lists templates. The 'White team only' note adds an access qualifier that further clarifies the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for retrieving a single template by ID (through the template_id parameter), but it does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives like admin_injects_get_templates or inject_get. The 'White team only' restriction provides some context but no direct comparison to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.