Skip to main content
Glama
sayll

dev-prompt-mcp

by sayll
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to dev-prompt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Inspector Server

      acnlabs
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server template that provides a foundation for building custom tools, resources, and prompts. Serves as a starting point for developers to create their own MCP server functionality.
      -
    • MCP-YNU FastMCP Server by ynu

      MCP-YNU FastMCP Serverofficial

      ynu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A dynamic MCP server implementation that automatically loads tools, resources, and prompts from their respective directories, allowing for easy extension and configuration.
      MIT

    • Lodestar MCP Server

      kanlanc
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This is an MCP server that facilitates building tools for interacting with various APIs and workflows, supporting Python-based development with potential for customizable prompts and user configurations.
      1
      -

    • Prompt Registry MCP

      stevengonsalvez
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight, file-based server for managing and serving personal prompt templates with variable substitution support via the Model Context Protocol. It allows users to store, update, and organize prompts in a local directory through integrated MCP tools and CLI assistants.
      4 npm
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools, get_prompt_names and reload_prompts, have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves names, the other reloads prompts. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set is on the lower end of appropriate. It feels thin for a prompt management server, which typically would have more operations, but it could be a minimal interface for simple listing and reloading.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface lacks essential operations for prompt management, such as retrieving prompt content, creating, updating, or deleting prompts. Agents cannot perform basic CRUD tasks, leading to significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources