dokploy_registry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses some behavior (test without persisting, default registryType) but lacks details on side effects, idempotency, permissions, and update behavior, leaving critical behavioral traits undocummented.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Though brief, the description uses a compact but cluttered format with dots and plus signs, hindering readability for an AI agent and lacking clear separation of actions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 9 parameters and 7 sub-actions without output schema or annotations, the description is insufficiently detailed to guide proper use, missing return values and parameter dependencies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning beyond schema for some parameters (default cloud type, test vs persist) but does not cover all parameters like imagePrefix and serverId, moderately compensating for low schema coverage (22%).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool manages container registries for pulling private images and enumerates sub-actions (list, get, create, etc.), distinguishing it from sibling tools focused on other resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives; it only lists actions without context or prerequisites, forcing the agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.