dokploy_mounts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the redeploy requirement but does not mention authorization, rate limits, side effects of removal, or return values. This is adequate but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense and front-loaded with the main purpose, but the action listing is cluttered. It could benefit from bullet points or clearer formatting.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 18 parameters, low schema coverage, and no annotations or output schema, the description covers action patterns but lacks details on return values, error scenarios, idempotency, and data loss implications.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (39%). The description adds significant meaning by mapping actions to required parameters (e.g., type=volume needs volumeName). However, some parameters like mongoId, mysqlId remain unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Manage mounts (volumes, bind mounts, files) attached to services' and enumerates all sub-actions with required parameters, distinguishing it from sibling tools like dokploy_application or dokploy_deployment.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit context: 'Mount changes require a redeploy of the parent service to take effect.' It also gives patterns for each action (create, update, remove, etc.). However, it does not mention when not to use this tool or compare with alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.