release_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states the actions but does not explain consequences (e.g., deletion is irreversible) or any side effects. The agent lacks information about what happens after an action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, to the point, and lists actions. However, it omits 'unarchive' from the list, which is a minor inaccuracy. Still, it is very concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description, combined with the schema, covers the basic purpose and parameters. However, it lacks guidance on when to use and behavioral implications, making it adequate but not complete given the context of sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds no additional semantics beyond listing actions, which matches the enum values. Thus, no added value over schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states it performs basic actions on existing content releases and lists the actions, distinguishing it from siblings like create_release and edit_release. However, it omits 'unarchive' from the listed actions, which is present in the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for basic actions on existing releases but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like schedule_release or mark_for_unpublish, nor does it state any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.