pm_get_team

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations and only a bare description, the tool's behavioral traits (e.g., read-only nature, required authentication) are not disclosed. The description provides no value beyond the endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is excessively terse—only restating the HTTP method and path. It is under-specified rather than concise, lacking necessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description fails to explain the tool's core behavior or provide any useful context for selection and invocation. It is far from complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters (team_id and x_user_id). No context is provided about their usage or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'GET /teams/{team_id}', which clearly indicates the tool retrieves a team by ID. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like pm_get_project or pm_get_task beyond the resource name, and the purpose is conveyed in a minimal way.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.