project-manager
Related Servers
Alternatives to project-manager
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Super Productivity's local REST API for task, project, and tag management, including CRUD operations, status checks, and daily planning prompts.17651 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to read and update tasks in the Nexus/TaskBridge project management system through its public API.138 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with System Task projects, teams, and tasks, providing daily briefs, project reports, team load, and risk identification, as well as creating and updating tasks and demands.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Claude to self-hosted Vikunja instances for conversational task and project management. Supports CRUD operations on projects and tasks, plus labels, comments, weekly reviews, calendar feeds, and task relations.44 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude Desktop to Redmine for seamless project and issue management, including searching, creating, updating, and tracking tasks using Redmine's API.1651,821 PyPI246Mozilla Public 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA localhost server that enables Claude to administer a firm's TimeLog account via the TimeLog REST API, allowing natural language project management and resource planning.33 npmISC
TDQS
Scored across 46 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., pm_create_comment vs pm_create_task). The names and descriptions make it clear which entity is being operated on, with no overlapping functionality. The distinction between pm_list_tags and pm_list_user_labels is explicit.
All tools follow the consistent pattern `pm_verb_noun`. Verbs are standard (create, get, list, update, delete, upload, download, export, attach, detach) and nouns correspond to resources. No mixed conventions or vague names.
46 tools is well above the typical well-scoped range (3-15). Even for a comprehensive project manager, this number is high and may overwhelm agents. It borders on excessive, as per calibration (25+ is too many).
The server covers CRUD for many entities (projects, tasks, comments, tags, users, files) but lacks update operations for organizations, teams, and user labels. Also team and organization deletion are missing. These are notable gaps that agents may encounter.