Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ARL-CMS MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and retrieve current K-eco regulation articles, verify citations and detect hallucinated titles, trace cross-references, run compliance-radar checks, inspect attachments, and sync current versions from ALIO through MCP-compatible clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to browse all 108 Saudi NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC-2:2024) in Arabic and English, search them by keyword or domain, and crosswalk ECC subdomains to ISO 27001 and NIST CSF 2.0 in either direction. It also returns PDPL obligations, NCA control families and their applicability, plus readiness scores, maturity bands and a prioritized gap list for a saved assessment.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Source-verified regulatory and compliance intelligence: 10,000+ obligations across 39 pillars, each grounded in a primary legal source with a content hash. Covers the EU AI Act, GDPR, DORA, NIS2, HIPAA, Basel III and the MITRE ATT&CK/ATLAS families.
      25
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (listing requirements, getting detail, checking compliance, searching policy, etc.). However, cms_list_requirements and cms_coverage_scan both deal with the 584-requirement catalog and domains, which could cause some confusion—cms_coverage_scan specifically reports domain/category counts and assets, but the distinction may not be immediately clear to an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent and informative prefix pattern: cms_ followed by a verb_underscore_noun (e.g., cms_list_requirements, cms_check_compliance, cms_get_requirement). This makes it easy to predict tool behavior from the name alone.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped. Each tool addresses a specific compliance-related task or query, and the number feels appropriate for the domain—neither too sparse nor overwhelming. The tool count supports effective navigation without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main compliance workflow: listing/fetching requirements, checking compliance against multiple tiers, searching internal policies, looking up risks, and mapping documents. Minor gaps exist—for example, there is no tool to add or update requirements or internal policies, and no direct way to fetch full document content (but that is handled by another MCP server).

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues