bricks_generate_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, placing the burden on the description. The description discloses it is a local helper with no API call, which is a key behavioral trait. It also states it returns an array of elements. This provides useful context beyond the schema, though more details on error handling or side effects could be added.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first front-loads the core purpose and key trait (local, no API), and the second lists available types. Every word earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (26 parameters, but 1 required) and lack of output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and return type. It could benefit from more detail about the structure of the returned array, but the generation context makes it understandable. Sibling tools are well-differentiated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema; the listed types are already in the enum. No extra guidance is provided on how parameters interact.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a complete section structure from a type, returning a ready-to-use Bricks elements array. It distinguishes from siblings like bricks_generate_element by highlighting it's a full section, not a single element. The mention 'LOCAL helper — no API call' further clarifies its scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for generating full sections, contrasting with single-element tools. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this vs alternatives or when not to use it. Without explicit exclusions or alternate tool names, some ambiguity remains.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.