Skip to main content
Glama
sabiertas

Bricks Builder MCP Server

by sabiertas

bricks_find_element

Search for page elements by type, text content, or CSS class. Returns matching elements with IDs, settings summary, and parent chain.

Instructions

Search elements within a page by type, text content, or CSS class. Returns matching elements with their IDs, settings summary, and parent chain.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteNoSite key for multi-site support. Available: main. Defaults to "main".
post_idYesThe page/post ID
post_typeNoPost type slug. Use "pages" for pages, "posts" for posts, or any registered CPT slug (e.g., "product", "portfolio"). Defaults to "pages".
element_typeNoFilter by element type name (e.g., "heading", "button")
text_searchNoSearch for text content within element settings
css_classNoFilter by CSS class name
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should fully disclose behavior. It states the tool is a search operation and mentions return fields, but doesn't explicitly confirm it's read-only or describe performance considerations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose and search criteria, second describes return data. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers search criteria and return structure (IDs, settings summary, parent chain). Lacks mention of pagination or limits, but sufficient for a query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema parameter descriptions, simply grouping the search criteria.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for elements within a page by type, text, or CSS class, and specifies the return data. It distinguishes itself from related tools like bricks_get_page_elements by focusing on search functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus siblings (e.g., bricks_get_page_elements, bricks_update_element). The description lacks context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sabiertas/bricks-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server