Skip to main content
Glama
saagpatel

MCP Trust Registry

by saagpatel
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Trust Registry

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • null-trust-score

      nullbuilds-ai
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query trust scores and security reviews for MCP servers before connecting, helping assess safety via a composite score and letter grade.
      -

    • dominion-observatory

      vdineshk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Behavioral trust scoring for MCP servers and AI agents. Live registry tracking 4,500+ servers with trust scores (0-100) based on interaction history, success rates, and latency
      2
      MIT
    • Agent-Town by agenttown

      Agent-Townofficial

      agenttown
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A neutral verification court for AI tools that ranks MCP servers by executing them against ground truth and recording results. Enables agents to consult execution records, contribute verdicts, and challenge claims.
      Apache 2.0

    • MCPVault

      coburn2716
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Search and evaluate MCP servers from your AI agent: quality grades, live verification status, install commands and client compatibility for 5,000+ servers.
      4
      73 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: list_servers provides an overview, check_server focuses on a single entity, and get_methodology explains the grading process. There is no overlap in functionality, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_servers, check_server, get_methodology. The verbs are clear and uniform, providing a predictable naming convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    The three tools together cover the core functionality of a trust registry: browsing, inspecting, and understanding the grading system. The count is well-scoped for the domain, not overly sparse nor excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    For a read-only trust registry that grades servers, the surface is complete: you can list all servers, retrieve details for a specific server, and access methodology. There are no dead ends or missing core operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources