Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hardwaremcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-first MCP server discovery tool that enables agents to search, inspect, and install MCP servers from multiple registries.
      13
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search a directory of 70,000+ MCP servers and agent skills, compare candidates side by side, and retrieve ready-to-paste install configs for clients such as Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and Grok Bot. It also surfaces recently added servers and skill install commands through read-only tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover, monitor, and control industrial hardware like ESP32 machine controllers and inspection cameras through a standardized MCP interface.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and browse an independent directory of 800+ open-source MCP servers by keyword, category, or use case, and to fetch individual server details, README-derived features and requirements, and known install configs. All tools are read-only, require no authentication, and are served over streamable HTTP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets MCP clients such as Claude, Cursor, VS Code and Codex search a hand-checked directory of MCP servers, AI plugins and agent tools, returning summaries, copy-paste install configs and setup guides. Also supports keyword and category browsing plus troubleshooting guide lookups, working offline from a bundled snapshot when needed.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: list_devices lists device families, search_servers searches by keyword, recommend_for_device recommends by device+goal, and get_server fetches details by slug. The only mild overlap is that both search_servers and recommend_for_device return server lists, but the descriptions clearly differentiate their inputs and purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (list_devices, search_servers, get_server), with recommend_for_device being the only slight variation but still consistent with the same convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a hardware MCP catalog: one for device families, one for recommendations, one for search, and one for details. Each tool has a clear, non-redundant role.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery by device, goal-based recommendations, keyword search, and detailed server info. The only minor gap is a direct way to browse or list all servers without a query or device, but search_servers likely accommodates that.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues