Quantified Self MCP Server
This server gives AI agents a local-first MCP interface to your personal health data, with read/write tools, analytics, and evidence-based provenance.
Read daily health metrics across 9 supported metrics (steps, sleep, heart rate, HRV, weight, etc.)
Export health data to CSV for long-range analysis without loading rows into context
Log daily metrics, raw timestamped measurements, and structured workout sessions
Clear or correct a single metric/day without affecting other data
Query raw measurements and workout sessions with filters
Inspect metric provenance by source and preview source-priority disagreements
Get single-metric history, baselines, trends, anomalies, period comparisons, and correlations
Scan all metrics for recent changes or get a full why-bundle for one metric on one date
Every analytics result includes coverage/confidence evidence, and private fields can be excluded via HEALTH_PRIVATE_FIELDS
Allows importing health data from Apple Health export files (XML) into the local database, as well as reading and logging daily health metrics.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Quantified Self MCP ServerWhat was my average sleep and steps last week?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Quantified Self MCP
Your health data. Your AI. Your machine.
A local-first MCP server that gives AI agents access to your personal health data โ with privacy, provenance, and evidence built in.
What is it?
Quantified Self MCP gives an AI agent a local, structured interface to your own health history.
Instead of another health dashboard, you can ask your AI questions like:
Why did my HRV change recently?
How has my sleep changed over the last 30 days?
What happened to my resting heart rate after my workouts increased?
What patterns do you see across my recent health data?
Which metrics changed the most this month?The AI retrieves the relevant data through MCP and analyzes it.
The goal isn't another health dashboard.
It's a trustworthy interface between your health history and your AI.
Related MCP server: apple-health-mcp
Why is it different?
๐ Local-first
Your health database runs locally in SQLite.
You control where your data goes.
You can use a completely local AI stack:
Health Data
โ
Local SQLite
โ
Quantified Self MCP
โ
MCP Agent
โ
Local LLMCloud models are also supported. In that configuration, the MCP database remains local, but data returned by MCP tools may be sent to the model provider.
๐ค AI-native
Built specifically for MCP-compatible AI agents, rather than another standalone health application.
๐ Evidence & provenance
Analytics can be traced back to the underlying health data and its provenance.
The goal is not simply:
HRV โ 24%but understanding:
What data produced this result?
Where did it come from?
What period was analyzed?
How strong is the evidence?Concretely, every trend, baseline, anomaly, comparison, and correlation carries a coverage/confidence object alongside its numbers, so the AI can talk about the result and the evidence behind it in the same breath:
Without evidence:
Your HRV decreased 24% over the last 30 days.
With evidence:
Your HRV decreased 24% over the last 30 days โ but HRV was only logged on 71% of those days, so treat this trend cautiously rather than as a settled pattern.
The second answer is what calculate_metric_trend (and every other analytics tool) is designed to make possible: the tool returns the 24% figure and a confidence: "moderate" / coverage_ratio: 0.71 alongside it, and each tool's own description tells the calling model to fold that into its answer instead of reporting the number as if it came from a complete series.
๐ Longitudinal
Analyze health history across days, weeks, months, and years:
trends
baselines
anomalies
period comparisons
correlations
recent changes
metric explanations
๐ฅ Import existing data
Bring your existing health history into the local database.
Supported imports include:
CSV
Apple Health exports
See the import documentation.
What can your AI do?
Read
Health metrics
Metric history
Raw measurements
Workout sessions
Data provenance
Analyze
Baselines
Trends
Anomalies
Period comparisons
Correlations
Explain
Recent changes
Metric changes
Supporting evidence
Data provenance
The MCP currently exposes 18 tools across data access, measurements, workouts, analytics, and personal intelligence.
See the tool reference for the complete list.
Supported data
Currently supported metrics include:
๐ Steps
๐ด Sleep
โค๏ธ Heart rate
โค๏ธ Resting heart rate
๐ HRV
โ๏ธ Weight
๐๏ธ Workout minutes
๐ Mood
๐ง Water
The data model is extensible, so you can keep only the metrics you actually use.
Quick start
Install
pip install quantified-self-mcpImport your data
CSV:
quantified-self-init-db your-health-data.csvApple Health:
quantified-self-init-db export.xmlConnect an MCP client
Configure your preferred MCP-compatible client to run:
quantified-self-mcpClient-specific setup guides are available in docs/clients/.
Ask your AI
How has my sleep changed over the last 30 days?That's it.
Privacy
Health data is sensitive.
Quantified Self MCP is designed around local ownership:
Your database stays on your machine.
No proprietary health-data cloud is required.
You choose the AI model.
You can run the entire stack locally.
Private metrics can be excluded from AI access.
For example:
HEALTH_PRIVATE_FIELDS=weight_kg,moodPrivate fields remain stored locally but are excluded from MCP read and analytical operations.
See SECURITY.md for security considerations.
Architecture
AI Agent
โ
MCP Protocol
โ
โผ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Quantified Self MCP โ
โ โ
โ Data ยท Analytics โ
โ Evidence โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโฌโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โผ
Local SQLite
โ
โผ
Your Health DataThe MCP server is the bridge between your health history and your AI.
Documentation
Detailed documentation lives outside the README:
Open source
Quantified Self MCP is open source and built for the wider MCP ecosystem.
Contributions are welcome โ especially around:
health-data imports
analytics
evidence and data quality
privacy
MCP client integrations
documentation
See CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
MIT
Your health data. Your AI. Your machine.
Local data. Open protocol. AI-powered insight.
Available Tools
18 toolsaggregate_measurementsPreview a source-priority resolution of a day's measurementsARead-onlyIdempotent
Preview what one day's raw measurements would roll up to if a conflicting metric were resolved using source_priority, alongside that day's actual current daily_metrics values.
daily_metrics is a database-maintained projection (see db/schema.sql): every log_measurement/import automatically keeps it in sync with all of that day's measurements the moment it's written, using each metric's fixed aggregation method (sum/mean/last โ see aggregation_rules, or get_baseline's "method" field). It blends every source together and cannot be made to prefer one โ there is no stored "priority" it can consult. So unlike before, this tool no longer writes anything: "aggregated" is only a preview of what source_priority would produce; "row" is the real, currently-stored value, computed from every source, which may well differ from "aggregated" whenever sources disagree.
If a metric has measurements from more than one source that day (e.g. an Apple Watch and a Garmin both logging resting_heart_rate), use get_metric_provenance first to see whether they actually disagree. To make daily_metrics itself reflect only one source going forward, remove the other source's data โ clear_metric (which now removes every measurement behind that metric/day, not just a log_daily_metric value) followed by re-logging the preferred reading, or re-running its import with --replace.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day to preview, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| source_priority | No | Ordered list of source names, e.g. ["Apple Watch", "Garmin"]. For any metric with more than one source that day, the first name in this list that's actually present wins in "aggregated" and the other source's readings for that metric are dropped from that preview. Omit to fall back to whichever source was imported most recently. Never affects "row" โ see above. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| row | Yes | |
| date | Yes | |
| aggregated | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false, and the description goes well beyond them by stating the tool 'no longer writes anything' and explaining that 'aggregated' is only a preview while 'row' is the actual stored value. It also adds a privacy note about data becoming part of the conversation sent to the model, which is valuable behavioral context not captured in annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is long but each section earns its place: it explains the database projection, the preview-vs-actual distinction, the recommended workflow with get_metric_provenance and clear_metric, and the privacy implications. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and avoids fluff, though a slightly tighter treatment of the schema background would improve it.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with output schema already present, the description covers everything else an agent needs: the difference between 'aggregated' and 'row', fallback behavior when source_priority is omitted, the relationship to daily_metrics, and the prerequisite step of checking provenance. There is no critical gap that would prevent correct invocation or interpretation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already documents both parameters with 100% coverage, including the date format and the ordered-list semantics of source_priority. The description reinforces the meaning but does not add substantial new parameter-level detail beyond what the schema's descriptions already provide, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Preview what one day's raw measurements would roll up to if a conflicting metric were resolved using source_priority, alongside that day's *actual* current daily_metrics values.' This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_metric_provenance and clear_metric by stating it is a read-only preview rather than a write or provenance inspection.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly tells the agent when to use a different tool first: 'If a metric has measurements from more than one source that day... use get_metric_provenance first to see whether they actually disagree.' It also explains that to change daily_metrics, the agent should use clear_metric followed by re-logging or re-importing, not this tool. This provides clear routing between the preview and the mutating alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
calculate_metric_trendCalculate metric trendARead-onlyIdempotent
Fit a simple straight-line trend to one metric over a window and report its direction, slope (change per day), and r_squared (how well a straight line actually fits โ low r_squared means "noisy," not "flat").
Use this tool when:
the user asks whether one metric is trending up/down/flat over a continuous window (e.g. "is my weight trending down?", "how has my HRV changed?").
Do not use this tool when:
the user wants two specific, separately-defined ranges compared (e.g. "this month vs last month") rather than a single continuous slope -> use
compare_metric_periodsinstead.the user asks what's typical/normal rather than which direction it's moving -> use
get_baselineinstead.the user asks about isolated unusual days rather than an overall direction -> use
detect_metric_anomaliesinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. | |
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 30 days before end_date. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| range | Yes | |
| trend | Yes | |
| metric | Yes | |
| evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
| claim_decision | No | How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it. |
| evidence_profile | No | Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already declare the tool read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the description is free to add interpretive guidance: low r_squared means 'noisy,' not 'flat.' It also discloses that returned data becomes part of the conversation sent to the configured model, which is a meaningful behavioral/privacy caveat.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and uses scannable bullets for usage conditions, which makes selection easy. It is longer than strictly necessary, but the privacy note and sibling routing add substantive guidance rather than padding.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich annotations, complete input schema, and presence of an output schema, the description covers everything an agent needs to decide when to use this tool and what to expect. It explains the distinction between slope and fit quality and appropriately routes ambiguous user intents to sibling tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already documents all three parameters at 100% coverage, including the metric enum, date formats, and defaults. The description reinforces 'one metric over a continuous window' but does not add significant parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific action: fit a straight-line trend to one metric over a window and report direction, slope, and r_squared. It clearly differentiates from siblings by naming compare_metric_periods, get_baseline, and detect_metric_anomalies as alternatives for different intents.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections with concrete example queries like 'is my weight trending down?' It names three sibling tools and the exact conditions under which each should be used instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
clear_metricClear a single metricADestructiveIdempotent
Blank out (set to null) a single metric for a single day, without touching that day's other metrics. The counterpart to log_daily_metric for undoing a bad value โ e.g. a mood logged for the wrong day, or a weight entered with the wrong units. Clears everything recorded for that metric/day โ including individual log_measurement readings or imported rows, not just a value log_daily_metric wrote directly โ so the metric genuinely goes back to "nothing recorded" rather than falling back to a blended value from whatever else is left.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day to clear a field for, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| field | Yes | Which metric to blank out. One of: steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| row | No | |
| note | No | |
| cleared | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description goes well beyond the annotations' destructiveHint by detailing the full scope of destruction: it clears everything recorded for that metric/day, including individual log_measurement readings and imported rows, not just values written by log_daily_metric. It also adds a privacy note about data becoming part of the conversation sent to a model, which annotations do not cover.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The main behavioral statement is front-loaded and precise, and the extra detail about clearing all related rows is necessary for a destructive tool. The privacy note adds relevant context but is somewhat tangential to invocation, keeping this from a perfect score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a two-parameter destructive operation, the description fully covers what the tool does, the scope of the destruction, and a privacy consideration. The output schema exists, so return-value details are not the description's responsibility.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents both parameters. The description reinforces the behavior ('set to null', 'single metric', 'single day') but does not add meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a precise verb ('blank out / set to null') and identifies the exact resource ('a single metric for a single day'), making the operation unmistakable. It also distinguishes itself from the sibling log_daily_metric by explicitly naming it as the counterpart for undoing a bad value.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly explains when to use this tool: for undoing a bad value, with concrete examples like a mood logged for the wrong day or weight entered with wrong units. It does not enumerate explicit when-not-to-use cases or alternative tools, but the context is clear enough for an agent to route correctly.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
compare_metric_periodsCompare two periodsARead-onlyIdempotent
Compare one metric's average between two date ranges โ e.g. "this month vs. last month" or "since starting a new medication vs. before." The two ranges may be any length and need not be adjacent or equal in size; each is summarized with its own baseline first.
Use this tool when:
the user names or implies two distinct date ranges to weigh against each other (e.g. "compare my average steps this month to last month", "since starting a new medication vs. before").
Do not use this tool when:
there's only one continuous window and the question is about direction over time, not two discrete ranges -> use
calculate_metric_trendinstead.the user wants "what's normal" for a single window, not a before/after comparison -> use
get_baselineinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. | |
| period_a_end | Yes | ||
| period_b_end | Yes | ||
| period_a_start | Yes | ||
| period_b_start | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| delta | No | |
| metric | Yes | |
| period_a | Yes | |
| period_b | Yes | |
| pct_change | No | |
| claim_decision | No | How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it. |
| period_a_stats | Yes | |
| period_b_stats | Yes | |
| evidence_profile | No | Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate. |
| period_a_evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
| period_b_evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already establish readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive behavior. The description adds genuinely useful context: the two ranges need not be equal or adjacent, each is summarized with its own baseline first, and returned data may be sent to the configured model. The privacy note adds responsible data-handling context beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Purpose is front-loaded and the tool is easy to scan with clear headers. The privacy note adds length but is relevant; the 'Use this tool when' example partly repeats the opening example, a minor redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description handles sibling differentiation, behavioral summary, and privacy well, and an output schema exists to explain return shape. The main gap is parameter format โ an agent still lacks the date syntax needed to call the tool correctly, and the phrase 'baseline first' is not fully clarified.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is only 20%, so the description must compensate for the four undocumented date parameters. It explains that the ranges represent any two date periods, but it never specifies date format (e.g., YYYY-MM-DD), inclusivity, or how period_a relates to period_b concretely.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource: 'Compare one metric's average between two date ranges.' The examples clarify the exact scenario, and the do-not-use section distinguishes it from calculate_metric_trend and get_baseline.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections with named alternatives. This gives an agent clear decision rules for selecting this tool versus calculate_metric_trend or get_baseline.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
detect_metric_anomaliesDetect metric anomaliesARead-onlyIdempotent
Flag days where one metric deviated sharply from its own baseline over the window, using a median/MAD-based modified z-score rather than a mean/stdev z-score โ more robust for short, noisy personal-health series, where the mean/stdev version is easily dragged around by the very outliers it's supposed to catch.
Use this tool when:
the user asks whether anything looked unusual/off/weird on particular days for one metric (e.g. "was there anything unusual about my sleep last month?").
Do not use this tool when:
the user wants a general sense of what's typical, with no interest in flagging specific days -> use
get_baselineinstead.the user asks about a steady increase/decrease over time rather than isolated spikes/dips -> use
calculate_metric_trendinstead.the user already has one specific date in mind and wants the full "why" behind it (baseline, anomaly, trend, and correlations together) -> use
explain_metric_changeinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. | |
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| threshold | No | Modified z-score cutoff. 3.5 (the default, Iglewicz & Hoaglin's standard value) flags only clear outliers; lower it (e.g. 2.5) to see more borderline days. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 90 days before end_date. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| range | Yes | |
| metric | Yes | |
| evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
| anomalies | Yes | |
| threshold | Yes | |
| claim_decision | No | How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it. |
| evidence_profile | No | Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, covering the safety profile. The description adds meaningful behavioral context: the statistical method's robustness rationale and a privacy note explaining that returned data becomes part of the model conversation. This exceeds the minimal annotation coverage, though the statistical rationale is more motivational than behavioral.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core behavior, then organized into clear usage sections and a privacy note. Every sentence serves a purpose: algorithm selection, usage routing, exclusions, and data-handling caution. It is longer than average but not bloated; the structure makes the length easy to scan.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with an output schema and fully documented input schema, the description supplies everything needed to select and invoke it correctly: purpose, statistical method, when-to-use vs alternatives, exclusions, and privacy implications. No critical gap remains for correct tool selection or invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schemas provide 100% parameter documentation, including defaults, formats, and the metric enum list. The description reinforces that the tool handles one metric at a time, but it does not add substantive semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies because the schema already does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The first sentence states a specific verb ('Flag'), a precise resource ('days where one metric deviated sharply from its own baseline'), and the algorithmic approach (median/MAD modified z-score). It explicitly contrasts with mean/stdev z-score and names sibling tools that handle different cases, so an agent can distinguish it immediately.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description has explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections, with concrete example phrasings and named alternatives (get_baseline, calculate_metric_trend, explain_metric_change). This gives the agent clear routing criteria rather than leaving selection to inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
explain_metric_changeExplain a metric changeARead-onlyIdempotent
Build an evidence bundle for "why did my look like that on ?": that day's value against a 90-day baseline, whether it qualifies as an anomaly, the trend leading into it, and any other metric that correlates with it strongly enough to be worth mentioning. Returns facts, not an explanation โ turning "sleep was 2.6 stdev below baseline and resting heart rate correlates at r=0.71" into an actual answer for the person is what the calling model should do with these facts, not something this tool guesses at itself.
Do not use this tool when:
scanning across many metrics for what changed lately, without a specific metric/date in mind -> use
get_recent_changesinstead.you only need one piece of this bundle (just the baseline, just the trend, just anomalies, or just a correlation) rather than the full why-explanation -> use
get_baseline,calculate_metric_trend,detect_metric_anomalies, orfind_metric_correlationdirectly instead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day to explain, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | |
| trend | Yes | |
| value | No | |
| metric | Yes | |
| baseline | Yes | |
| sessions | No | |
| is_anomaly | Yes | |
| baseline_range | Yes | |
| claim_decision | No | How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it. |
| trend_evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
| narrative_facts | Yes | |
| conflicting_days | No | |
| evidence_profile | No | Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate. |
| modified_z_score | No | |
| baseline_evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
| correlated_metrics | Yes | |
| trend_claim_decision | No | |
| trend_evidence_profile | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
While annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive, the description adds essential behavioral context: it states the tool returns facts, not explanations, and warns that returned data becomes part of the conversation and may be sent to a cloud model. This goes well beyond what annotations cover, giving the agent important privacy and usage boundaries.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is long but tightly structured: it opens with the core purpose, explains the output's nature, then provides clear exclusion rules, and ends with a privacy caveat. Every sentence earns its place, and the most important guidance is front-loaded. The length is justified by the tool's complexity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (baseline, anomaly, trend, correlation) and the availability of an output schema, the description is exceptionally complete. It tells the agent exactly what the tool returns, when to avoid using it, and the privacy implications. Nothing an agent needs to make a correct call is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema documents both parameters fully (metric with a list of valid values, and date with format). The description adds little parameter-specific meaning beyond what's already in the schema. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 is appropriate, and the description doesn't need to repeat schema details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states precisely what the tool does: it builds an evidence bundle for explaining a metric change on a specified date, including baseline, anomaly, trend, and correlated metrics. It explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings by naming alternative tools for different scenarios, making it unmistakable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
A dedicated 'Do not use this tool when' section lists two distinct cases, each with specific alternative tool names and the conditions that trigger them. This gives the agent crystal-clear routing guidance beyond just a general description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
export_health_data_csvExport health data to CSVADestructiveIdempotent
Write daily health metrics for a date range to a CSV file on disk, next to the database, instead of returning every row through this tool's own result.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
Unlike read_health_data, this is not capped at MAX_ROWS_RETURNED and the row values themselves are not included in this tool's response โ only the resulting file's path and a row count are. That means a long-range export doesn't have to pass through a cloud LLM's context just to produce a file you can open yourself (in a spreadsheet, a notebook, another tool, etc.). Any metric listed in HEALTH_PRIVATE_FIELDS is still written as an empty cell in the file, since those fields shouldn't leave the database at all, not just stay out of the model's context.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 30 days before end_date. Ranges over ~10 years are rejected. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | |
| range | Yes | |
| rows_exported | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations mark destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description fully supports this: it states it writes to disk, does not return row values, and only provides file path and row count. It goes beyond annotations by disclosing the privacy implication (data becomes part of the conversation) and the handling of HEALTH_PRIVATE_FIELDS as empty cells. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is somewhat long but each paragraph earns its place: purpose, privacy note, and comparison with read_health_data. It is front-loaded with the main action and uses structured paragraphs. Slightly verbose but not padded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool that writes to disk and has privacy implications, the description covers all necessary aspects: side effects, return value (path and row count), difference from read_health_data, private field behavior, and privacy guidance. The output schema exists, so return format is already specified. An agent has everything needed to decide and call this tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema provides 100% coverage: both start_date and end_date have clear descriptions with formatting and defaults. The description adds no new semantic detail about the parameters beyond 'date range', so it stays at the baseline for well-covered schemas.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb-resource pair: 'Write daily health metrics for a date range to a CSV file on disk, next to the database.' It clearly distinguishes itself from read_health_data by contrasting the output (file path vs. rows) and the row cap. An agent immediately knows what this tool does and how it differs from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explicitly names the alternative (read_health_data) and explains the differentiator: this tool is not capped at MAX_ROWS_RETURNED and avoids passing data through the model context. It also advises treating the export like pasting into a chat if the model is cloud-based. This gives the agent clear conditions for choosing this tool over alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
find_metric_correlationFind correlation between two metricsARead-onlyIdempotent
Compute the Pearson correlation between two metrics over the same window, joined by date. Correlation, not causation: a strong r just means the two moved together, not that one caused the other.
Use this tool when:
the user names or implies two different metrics and asks whether they move together (e.g. "does my sleep affect my mood?", "did my HRV change after I increased my workouts?").
Do not use this tool when:
only one metric is in question -> use
get_baseline,calculate_metric_trend, ordetect_metric_anomaliesinstead, depending on what's being asked about that one metric.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| lag_days | No | Shift metric_b this many days later before joining โ 1 tests whether metric_a today predicts metric_b tomorrow (e.g. "does poor sleep tonight predict lower steps tomorrow?"). 0 (default) compares same-day values. | |
| metric_a | Yes | ||
| metric_b | Yes | ||
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 90 days before end_date. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| n | Yes | |
| r | No | |
| note | No | |
| lag_days | Yes | |
| metric_a | Yes | |
| metric_b | Yes | |
| evidence_a | No | |
| evidence_b | No | |
| claim_decision | No | How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it. |
| evidence_profile | No | Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate. |
| sample_confidence | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, covering safety. The description adds value by explaining the computation method (Pearson correlation), the join by date, the correlation-not-causation caveat, and a privacy note about data leaving the local server. These are behavior traits not in annotations, so the description is transparent and adds context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is structured: purpose statement, caveat, usage conditions, exclusion with alternatives, and a privacy note. It is front-loaded with the core meaning and uses clear bullet-like statements. Slightly longer than strictly necessary due to the privacy note, but each section adds useful guidance and does not waste words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (5 params, 2 required, output schema present), the description covers what the tool does, when to use it, exclusions, and adds a privacy context. The only gap is parameter details for metric_a/b, but the description implies they are metric names, which is likely obvious for an agent. With output schema existing, return values need no explanation. Overall it is sufficient for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 60% (end_date, lag_days, start_date have descriptions; metric_a and metric_b do not). The description does not provide explicit parameter names or value formats for metric_a/b, though it implies they are metric identifiers via examples. This partially compensates for the coverage gap but leaves meaning to inference. Baseline for 60% coverage is 3, and the description adds marginal value but not full compensation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states the tool computes Pearson correlation between two metrics joined by date, which is a specific verb+resource+method. It also distinguishes from single-metric tools by emphasizing 'two different metrics' and gives example phrasings. This is clear and differentiates from siblings like calculate_metric_trend or detect_metric_anomalies.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections, naming specific alternative tools (get_baseline, calculate_metric_trend, detect_metric_anomalies) for single-metric queries. This gives agents clear decision criteria for routing to the correct tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_baselineGet metric baselineARead-onlyIdempotent
Compute "what's normal" for one metric over a window: mean, median, and standard deviation. This is the number every other analytics tool below measures against, so a wider window (60-90+ days) gives a more stable baseline than the 30-day default read_health_data uses.
Use this tool when:
the user asks what's normal/typical/usual for one metric (e.g. "what's normal for my resting heart rate?"), with no particular day or direction of change in mind.
Do not use this tool when:
the user asks whether a metric is going up/down over time -> use
calculate_metric_trendinstead.the user asks whether specific days looked unusual -> use
detect_metric_anomaliesinstead.the user wants two ranges compared against each other -> use
compare_metric_periodsinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. | |
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 90 days before end_date. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| range | Yes | |
| metric | Yes | |
| baseline | Yes | |
| evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond the readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive annotations, the description discloses the default window behavior, stability tradeoffs, and the privacy implication that returned data becomes part of the model conversation. No contradiction with annotations exists.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with the core definition front-loaded, followed by compact usage bullets. The privacy note is somewhat long but provides important context that is not available elsewhere.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers purpose, usage alternatives, parameter guidance, and privacy implications, while the output schema handles return-value expectations. Nothing essential for correct invocation is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds actionable parameter guidance: it recommends a 60-90+ day window for stability and contrasts it with read_health_data's 30-day default. It also clarifies that the tool handles exactly one metric.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a clear, specific operation: compute what's normal for one metric over a window with mean, median, and standard deviation. It distinguishes itself from sibling analytics tools by emphasizing the single-metric baseline scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description contains explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections, naming calculate_metric_trend, detect_metric_anomalies, and compare_metric_periods with their respective trigger conditions. This gives an agent unambiguous routing guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_metric_historyGet metric historyARead-onlyIdempotent
Read one metric's day-by-day values, without the other six metrics read_health_data always includes. Use this when you only care about a single metric (e.g. before calling get_baseline or calculate_metric_trend yourself) and don't need the full multi-metric payload.
Use this tool when:
the user wants one specific metric's history/trend over time (e.g. "show my weight over the last 30 days", "how has resting heart rate changed this month").
Do not use this tool when:
the request is broad/general, across multiple metrics at once -> use
read_health_datainstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric | Yes | One of steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms. Rejected if configured as private via HEALTH_PRIVATE_FIELDS. | |
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 30 days before end_date. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| range | Yes | |
| metric | Yes | |
| points | Yes | |
| evidence | Yes | Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is based on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds valuable context beyond annotations: a clear privacy note that returned data becomes part of the conversation sent to the configured model, and the behavioral scoping that it returns a single metric rather than the full multi-metric payload. No contradictions with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded: the core purpose is in the first sentence, followed by clear when/do-not-use sections, then a privacy note. Every section earns its place, and there is no filler or repetition. The formatting with bullets makes it easily parseable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich input schema, output schema, and annotations, the description covers everything an agent needs: what the tool returns, when to use it, when not to, and the privacy implications of calling it. There are no significant gaps that would cause an agent to misinvoke or misuse the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes metric options, date formats, defaults, and privacy rejection behavior. The description adds example use cases like "show my weight over the last 30 days" that imply how start_date/end_date work, but it doesn't materially extend parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: "Read one metric's day-by-day values". It immediately distinguishes itself from the sibling read_health_data by noting what it omits ("without the other six metrics read_health_data always includes"). This makes it easy for an agent to select it over alternatives without examining schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description has explicit "Use this tool when" and "Do not use this tool when" sections. It gives concrete example user requests, names the alternative (read_health_data) for broad multi-metric requests, and even suggests a workflow (calling this before get_baseline or calculate_metric_trend). This is exactly the kind of decision-making guidance an agent needs.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_metric_provenanceBreak a metric down by sourceARead-onlyIdempotent
Show one metric's raw measurements for one day, broken down by which source reported them โ answers "which one is correct?" when e.g. an Apple Watch and a Garmin disagree on resting heart rate, instead of silently averaging two different devices into one number.
Do not use this tool when:
the user just wants a plain day-by-day history for the metric, with no need to see the per-source breakdown -> use
get_metric_historyinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day to inspect, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| metric | Yes | Name of the metric to inspect, e.g. "resting_heart_rate". |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | |
| metric | Yes | |
| sources | Yes | |
| conflict | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, and the description adds meaningful context beyond that: it explains the data becomes part of the conversation and may be sent to a cloud model. This is a real behavioral disclosure about data flow and privacy that an agent could not infer from the schema or annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well structured: purpose leads, a do-not-use block clearly distinguishes the sibling tool, and the privacy note is placed at the end. It is longer than strictly necessary because of the privacy explanation, but each paragraph earns its place and the key information is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple two-parameter input, full schema coverage, output schema presence, and complete annotations, the description covers what an agent needs to call this tool correctly. The only minor gap is that it does not spell out the exact return shape or whether source values are normalized, but the output schema covers that burden.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers 100% of the two parameters, including formats and examples for `date` and `metric`. The description does not add much beyond the schema, but the terms 'one day' and 'metric' reinforce the single-day, single-metric scope. The schema does the heavy lifting, so a baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a concrete action and resource: 'Show one metric's raw measurements for one day, broken down by which source reported them.' It directly distinguishes the tool from the sibling `get_metric_history` by emphasizing the per-source breakdown and the 'which one is correct?' use case. The verb and scope are specific enough that an agent can tell what it is for.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly names the alternative: 'Do not use this tool when... use `get_metric_history` instead.' It also gives a concrete triggering scenario (e.g., Apple Watch and Garmin disagreeing on resting heart rate), making both when-to-use and when-not-to-use clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_recent_changesGet recent changesARead-onlyIdempotent
Scan every (non-private) metric for what's changed lately: a recent period vs. the four-times-as-long period before it (period-over-period shift), any anomalies inside the recent period, and a trend over it. The single best tool to start a "how have I been doing?" conversation with โ it does the scanning across all metrics that would otherwise take one get_baseline/detect_metric_anomalies/calculate_metric_trend call per metric.
Do not use this tool when:
the user already named a specific metric and wants the full why-bundle for it (value, baseline, anomaly flag, trend, correlated metrics) -> use
explain_metric_changeinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | No | Length of the "recent" window in days (default 7). The comparison baseline is the 4x-as-long period immediately before it, so a 7-day recent window compares against the preceding 28 days. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| changes | Yes | |
| recent_range | Yes | |
| baseline_range | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive. The description adds a crucial behavioral note: the returned data becomes part of the conversation sent to the model, with a privacy implication. It also explains the scanning behavior across all metrics, which is beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured: it opens with the core purpose, then gives explicit non-usage guidance, and ends with a privacy note. Each section earns its place without fluff, and the most important information is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool that scans all metrics, it clearly explains what it does, when to use it, when not to, and the privacy implications. The output schema is provided elsewhere, so the description doesn't need to detail return values. It's complete for an agent to decide and call correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter, days, is already fully described in the input schema (100% coverage) including its default and comparison baseline. The description doesn't add additional parameter details, matching the baseline of 3 when schema carries the semantic load.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool scans every non-private metric for changes, describing period-over-period shift, anomalies, and trend. It explicitly distinguishes itself from per-metric tools and names the alternative for specific-metric queries, so an agent can immediately understand its scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It provides explicit guidance: it's the best tool for a 'how have I been doing?' conversation, and it explicitly lists a condition to avoid (user named a specific metric) and directs to explain_metric_change. This gives both positive and negative usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
log_daily_metricLog a daily metricADestructiveIdempotent
Record one or more health metrics for a single day, creating that day's row if it doesn't already have one.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
Only the metrics you pass are written โ anything left as null is not touched, so logging just today's mood doesn't erase today's steps if they were set earlier. To undo a value logged by mistake, use clear_metric rather than trying to overwrite it with a placeholder.
Use this tool when:
the user is recording a simple day-level value for one of the nine fixed metrics below (e.g. "log my weight as 82 kg", "I walked 8,000 steps today").
Do not use this tool when:
the observation needs its own timestamp/source, or the day may have more than one reading of the same metric -> use
log_measurementinstead.it's a workout/exercise session -> use
log_workout_sessioninstead (workout_minutes here is just the daily total, not the session itself).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day to log, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| mood | No | Mood rating on a 1-10 scale. | |
| steps | No | Step count for the day. 0-200,000. | |
| hrv_ms | No | Heart rate variability in milliseconds. 0-300. | |
| water_ml | No | Water intake in millilitres. 0-10,000. | |
| weight_kg | No | Body weight in kilograms. 1-500. | |
| heart_rate | No | Non-resting heart rate reading in bpm. 20-250. | |
| sleep_hours | No | Hours of sleep. 0-24. | |
| workout_minutes | No | Minutes of exercise. 0-1,440. | |
| resting_heart_rate | No | Resting heart rate in bpm. 20-250. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| row | Yes | |
| logged | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond the annotations, the description discloses the crucial merge behavior: null metrics are untouched and only passed metrics are written. It also adds a privacy note about data becoming part of the conversation and suggests clear_metric for undo. These are meaningful behavioral details that do not contradict the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with a front-loaded core statement, a privacy section, a merge-behavior section, and explicit usage conditions. Despite its length, every section addresses a real agent decision and no sentence is filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutating tool with 10 parameters, the description covers sibling selection, partial-update semantics, privacy implications, and recovery via clear_metric. An output schema exists, so return-value details are not necessary. The tool is fully specified for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes all 10 parameters with units and ranges, so the baseline is 3. The description adds context like 'workout_minutes here is just the daily total' and the null-not-touched rule, but does not need to repeat the schema's per-parameter details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Record one or more health metrics for a single day', and explains the row-creation behavior. It also explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings like log_measurement and log_workout_session, so an agent can tell them apart without inspecting schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description has clear 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections with concrete conditions and named alternatives. It routes timestamped readings to log_measurement and workout sessions to log_workout_session, leaving no ambiguity about selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
log_measurementLog a raw measurementA
Record a single raw observation โ one metric, one value, one point in time โ rather than a whole day's summary. Use this instead of log_daily_metric when the source, exact time, or the fact that there were multiple readings that day matters (e.g. three separate workouts, or a wearable's periodic heart-rate samples).
Use this tool when:
recording one timestamped observation where the exact time, source, or possibility of multiple same-day readings matters (e.g. "record my blood pressure reading from my cuff at 7am").
Do not use this tool when:
it's just a single end-of-day value for a fixed metric -> use
log_daily_metricinstead.it's a workout/exercise session -> use
log_workout_sessioninstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| unit | No | Unit the value is in, e.g. "bpm", "kg". Optional. | |
| value | Yes | The numeric reading. | |
| metric | Yes | Name of the metric, e.g. "resting_heart_rate", "steps". Not free-form: must already have an entry in the aggregation_rules table (steps, sleep_hours, resting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms, out of the box) โ daily_metrics is a database-maintained projection over measurements (see db/schema.sql), so every metric written to it needs a known aggregation method (sum/mean/last) or there would be nothing telling the projection how to roll same-day readings up. metrics_schema lists the current set. | |
| source | No | Where this came from, e.g. "Apple Watch", "manual". Optional. | |
| timestamp | Yes | When the observation was taken, YYYY-MM-DD or a full ISO 8601 timestamp (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS). | |
| source_type | No | Category of source, e.g. "wearable", "manual", "app". Optional. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| measurement | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already convey write semantics (readOnlyHint=false), so the description adds useful context beyond them: a privacy caveat about data becoming part of the conversation sent to the model, local SQLite storage, and the fact that daily_metrics is a projection over measurements. No contradiction with annotations exists.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded: the core definition and sibling distinction come first, followed by bulleted usage guidance and a privacy note. Every sentence adds value; there is no redundant filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a write tool with an output schema and annotations already present, the description covers purpose, when to use it, when not to use it, metric constraints via the schema, and privacy behavior. An agent has everything needed to select and invoke the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with rich parameter details (metric must exist in aggregation_rules, timestamp format, optional fields), so the description is not required to carry parameter documentation. It does not add much standalone parameter meaning beyond reinforcing the point-in-time nature of the reading.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('record') and resource ('a single raw observation') with clear scoping: one metric, one value, one point in time. It immediately distinguishes itself from a daily summary and from sibling tools, so an agent can tell log_measurement apart without opening schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections, naming concrete alternatives: log_daily_metric for end-of-day values and log_workout_session for workout sessions. The conditions for choosing this tool over alternatives are unambiguous.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
log_workout_sessionLog a workout sessionA
Record one workout as a structured event โ activity, timing, intensity, and heart-rate response โ rather than folding it into the day's workout_minutes total. Use this alongside (not instead of) log_daily_metric/log_measurement for workout_minutes: this is what lets explain_metric_change say what the workout was, not just how long it ran. A day can have more than one session; each call adds a new row.
Use this tool when:
the user describes an actual workout/exercise session (e.g. "I went running for 40 minutes", "log today's strength workout").
Do not use this tool when:
the user only wants to record the day's total exercise minutes as a single number, with no activity type/timing/intensity -> use
log_daily_metric(workout_minutes) orlog_measurementinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | The day the workout happened, YYYY-MM-DD. | |
| notes | No | Free-text notes, e.g. route or how it felt. Optional. | |
| source | No | Where this came from, e.g. "Apple Watch", "manual". Optional. | |
| intensity | No | One of "low", "moderate", "high". Optional. | |
| start_time | No | When it started, HH:MM (24-hour) or a full ISO timestamp. Optional. | |
| activity_type | Yes | What kind of workout, e.g. "running", "cycling", "strength". Free-form. | |
| avg_heart_rate | No | Average heart rate during the workout, bpm. Optional. | |
| max_heart_rate | No | Peak heart rate during the workout, bpm. Optional. | |
| duration_minutes | Yes | How long it lasted, in minutes. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| session | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, etc., but the description adds important behavior: 'each call adds a new row' clarifies non-idempotence specifics, and the privacy note about data becoming part of the conversation sent to the model is unique contextual disclosure. No contradictions with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with a strong first sentence, followed by structured usage guidance and a privacy note. It is longer than the minimal two-sentence example, but every section contributes value given the tool's complexity and need to disambiguate from siblings. The explicitly labeled sections compensate for length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is complete enough for a 9-parameter tool with 100% schema coverage and an output schema. It covers when to use, when not, privacy implications, and multi-session behavior. No significant context is missing for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents each of the 9 parameters. The description adds a high-level grouping ('activity, timing, intensity, heart-rate response') but does not provide parameter-level semantics beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 applies since schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action and resource: 'Record one workout as a structured event โ activity, timing, intensity, and heart-rate response.' It explicitly contrasts with log_daily_metric/log_measurement for workout_minutes and explains the relationship to explain_metric_change, distinguishing it from siblings without the need to open schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections with concrete examples ('I went running for 40 minutes') and names the exact alternatives (log_daily_metric / log_measurement) for the excluded cases. This goes beyond mere context to actionable selection criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
read_health_dataRead health dataARead-onlyIdempotent
Read daily health metrics from the local database: steps, sleep hours, resting heart rate, weight (kg), workout minutes, mood, and water intake (ml).
Use this tool when:
the request is broad/general, across multiple metrics at once (e.g. "what health data do I have?", "overview of this week").
Do not use this tool when:
the user wants one specific metric's history/trend over time -> use
get_metric_historyinstead.the user wants raw/individual measurement rows (timestamp, source) -> use
read_measurementsinstead.the user wants workout sessions specifically -> use
read_workout_sessionsinstead.the user is asking why something changed, or wants a trend, anomaly, comparison, or correlation -> use
explain_metric_change(one metric, one date) orget_recent_changes(scan across all metrics) instead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| end_date | No | Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today. | |
| start_date | No | First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to 30 days before end_date. Ranges over ~10 years are rejected. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| rows | Yes | |
| range | Yes | |
| summary | Yes | |
| coverage | Yes | Multi-metric coverage for a Layer-1 result spanning several metrics at once. See evidence.build_coverage_summary for how each field is computed; unlike Evidence (one metric, gaps/freshness/recent_gap), this reports a coverage_percent per metric side by side. |
| truncated | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is established. The description adds meaningful context beyond that: the data returned is daily aggregated metrics (not raw rows), the database is a local SQLite file, and returned data may be sent to the configured model โ a privacy-relevant behavior an agent should weigh before invoking.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is longer than average but every section earns its place: a front-loaded metrics list, explicit routing rules, and a privacy note. The use of bullets under 'Use when' and 'Do not use when' makes the guidance scannable for an agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the crowded sibling set (17 tools), the description fully disambiguates this tool from get_metric_history, read_measurements, read_workout_sessions, explain_metric_change, and get_recent_changes. Combined with rich annotations, full schema coverage, and an output schema, nothing needed to select or invoke the tool correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents start_date and end_date with defaults and formatting. The description adds no new parameter-level detail, but under high schema coverage the baseline of 3 applies; no compensation is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Read daily health metrics from the local database,' and lists the exact metrics covered (steps, sleep, heart rate, etc.). It also distinguishes itself from closely related siblings (get_metric_history, read_measurements, read_workout_sessions), so an agent knows exactly what this tool does and does not cover.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The 'Use this tool when' section explicitly directs broad/general multi-metric requests to this tool, and the 'Do not use this tool when' section names four alternatives with the exact conditions that should route elsewhere. This is the strongest possible usage guidance โ no inference is required.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
read_measurementsRead raw measurementsARead-onlyIdempotent
Read individual measurement rows (not the daily_metrics aggregate), most recent first. Use this to see exactly when and where each reading came from, rather than just a day's summarized value.
Use this tool when:
the user wants raw/individual observations (e.g. "what measurements have I recorded?"), including their timestamp or source.
Do not use this tool when:
the user wants a broad, multi-metric overview -> use
read_health_datainstead.the user wants one metric's day-by-day history -> use
get_metric_historyinstead.the user wants workout sessions -> use
read_workout_sessionsinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Maximum rows to return (default 200). | |
| metric | No | Only return this metric. Omit for all metrics. | |
| source | No | Only return rows from this source, e.g. "Apple Watch". Omit for all sources. | |
| end_date | No | Only return rows on/before this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Omit for no upper bound. | |
| start_date | No | Only return rows on/after this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Omit for no lower bound. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| count | Yes | |
| measurements | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark the tool readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond that: results are ordered most recent first, the tool returns raw rows rather than aggregates, and the privacy note discloses that returned data becomes part of the conversation sent to the model. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, then structured into clear usage and exclusions lists, followed by a well-scoped privacy note. Every sentence earns its place; the formatting makes it easy for an agent to scan for the decision-relevant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a read-only, optional-parameter tool with a rich output schema and full schema coverage, the description provides everything an agent needs: what the tool returns, ordering behavior, when to prefer alternatives, and privacy implications. There is no meaningful gap in operational or decision context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all five optional parameters. The description adds only indirect context (e.g., that results include timestamps and sources) but does not need to explain parameter syntax or semantics since the schema already handles that burden. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Read') with a precise resource ('individual measurement rows'), and immediately distinguishes the tool from the daily_metrics aggregate. It also names the data orientation (most recent first) and what kind of detail it exposes (timestamp/source), making its purpose unambiguous and distinct from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states when to use the tool with a concrete user-intent example, and provides a dedicated 'Do not use this tool when' section that names three sibling alternatives (read_health_data, get_metric_history, read_workout_sessions). This gives an agent clear routing guidance with no inference required.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
read_workout_sessionsRead workout sessionsARead-onlyIdempotent
Read individual workout sessions (not the daily_metrics workout_minutes total), most recent day first. Use this to see what each workout actually was โ activity, timing, intensity, heart rate โ rather than just a day's summed minutes.
Use this tool when:
the user asks about workouts/exercise sessions specifically (e.g. "what workouts did I do this week?", "show my recent gym sessions").
Do not use this tool when:
the user just wants the daily workout_minutes total, not individual sessions -> use
read_health_dataorget_metric_historyinstead.
Privacy note: this server and its SQLite file are entirely local, but the data returned by this tool becomes part of the conversation sent to whatever model the calling client is configured with. If that model runs in the cloud rather than on your machine, treat this the same as pasting the data into a chat with that provider.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Maximum rows to return (default 200). | |
| end_date | No | Only return sessions on/before this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Omit for no upper bound. | |
| start_date | No | Only return sessions on/after this date (YYYY-MM-DD). Omit for no lower bound. | |
| activity_type | No | Only return sessions of this activity type. Omit for all types. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| count | Yes | |
| sessions | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond the annotations (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), the description adds genuinely useful behavioral context: ordering is 'most recent day first,' the tool returns session-level detail rather than daily totals, and it discloses a privacy implication about data becoming part of the conversation. These are meaningful traits not captured by the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core definition, followed by structured usage guidance and a relevant privacy note. Every section earns its place: the first sentence states the tool's scope, the bullets give actionable routing rules, and the privacy note is important for local-vs-cloud model contexts. No filler is present.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich annotations, full parameter schema coverage, and presence of an output schema, the description supplies all remaining context an agent needs: when to use it, when not to, how results are ordered, and what data is returned. The alternative tools are explicitly named, so the surrounding tool ecosystem is adequately addressed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents limit, start_date, end_date, and activity_type fully. The description reinforces the overall intent but does not add parameter-specific detail beyond what the input schema provides, matching the baseline for full schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a precise verb and resource: 'Read individual workout sessions,' and immediately disambiguates from the daily_metrics workout_minutes total. It also enumerates the meaningful fields returned (activity, timing, intensity, heart rate) and contrast with daily aggregates, making the tool's purpose unmistakable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit 'Use this tool when' and 'Do not use this tool when' sections with concrete example queries and names the alternatives (read_health_data, get_metric_history). An agent can confidently route between this tool and its siblings without further inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
6 tool updates
v1.0.20- Changed
calculate_metric_trend2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +}
- Changed
compare_metric_periods2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +}
- Changed
detect_metric_anomalies2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +}
- Changed
explain_metric_change6 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +} - added
Output schema / properties / trend_claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / trend_evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +}
- Changed
find_metric_correlation2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +}
- Changed
get_recent_changes2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / changes / items / properties / claim_decisionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "must_state": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "permitted_phrasing_class": { + "type": "string" + }, + "template": { + "type": "string" + }, + "tier": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "tier", + "permitted_phrasing_class", + "must_state", + "template" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "How strongly this result may be stated. tier is insufficient, suggestive, detectable_not_meaningful or supported; every entry in must_state has to be mentioned when reporting it." +} - added
Output schema / properties / changes / items / properties / evidence_profileAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "can_block": { + "default": true, + "type": "boolean" + }, + "details": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "dimension": { + "enum": [ + "sample", + "temporal", + "robustness", + "missingness", + "practical", + "measurement_validity", + "provenance" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "reason_codes": { + "items": { + "type": "string" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "status": { + "enum": [ + "adequate", + "negligible", + "not_assessed", + "weak", + "concern", + "blocking" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "dimension", + "status" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "effect": { + "additionalProperties": true, + "type": "object" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "metric", + "analysis", + "dimensions" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Per-dimension evidence quality behind this result (sample, temporal, missingness, ...). Dimensions without an evaluator yet are 'not_assessed' and cap the claim, never count as adequate." +}
4 tool updates
v1.0.19- Changed
aggregate_measurements2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / date / descriptionPrevious value: -"The day to aggregate, formatted YYYY-MM-DD."New value: +"The day to preview, formatted YYYY-MM-DD." - changed
Input schema / properties / source_priority / descriptionPrevious value: -"Ordered list of source names, e.g. [\"Apple\nWatch\", \"Garmin\"]. For any metric with more than one source\nthat day, the first name in this list that's actually present\nwins and the other source's readings for that metric are\ndropped from the aggregate. Omit to fall back to whichever\nsource was imported most recently."New value: +"Ordered list of source names, e.g. [\"Apple\nWatch\", \"Garmin\"]. For any metric with more than one source\nthat day, the first name in this list that's actually present\nwins in \"aggregated\" and the other source's readings for that\nmetric are dropped from that preview. Omit to fall back to\nwhichever source was imported most recently. Never affects\n\"row\" โ see above."
- Changed
explain_metric_change3 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / conflicting_daysAdded value: +{ + "default": 0, + "type": "integer" +} - added
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / properties / sample_confidenceAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric_a", - "metric_b", - "lag_days", - "n" -]New value: +[ + "metric_a", + "metric_b", + "lag_days", + "n", + "sample_confidence" +]
- Changed
find_metric_correlation2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / sample_confidenceAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric_a", - "metric_b", - "lag_days", - "n" -]New value: +[ + "metric_a", + "metric_b", + "lag_days", + "n", + "sample_confidence" +]
- Changed
log_measurement1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / metric / descriptionPrevious value: -"Name of the metric, e.g. \"resting_heart_rate\", \"steps\".\nFree-form โ not limited to daily_metrics' fixed columns."New value: +"Name of the metric, e.g. \"resting_heart_rate\", \"steps\".\nNot free-form: must already have an entry in the\naggregation_rules table (steps, sleep_hours,\nresting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood,\nwater_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms, out of the box) โ daily_metrics\nis a database-maintained projection over measurements (see\ndb/schema.sql), so every metric written to it needs a known\naggregation method (sum/mean/last) or there would be nothing\ntelling the projection how to roll same-day readings up.\nmetrics_schema lists the current set."
4 tool updates
v1.0.17- Changed
calculate_metric_trend1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / trend / properties / span_daysAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +}
- Changed
explain_metric_change1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / trend / properties / span_daysAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +}
- Changed
get_recent_changes2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / changes / items / properties / evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / changes / items / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "kind", - "detail" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "kind", + "detail", + "evidence" +]
- Changed
read_health_data2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / coverageAdded value: +{ + "description": "Multi-metric coverage for a Layer-1 result spanning several metrics\nat once. See evidence.build_coverage_summary for how each field is\ncomputed; unlike Evidence (one metric, gaps/freshness/recent_gap),\nthis reports a coverage_percent per metric side by side.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_percent": { + "type": "number" + }, + "days_expected": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "days_with_data": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "metrics": { + "additionalProperties": { + "type": "number" + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "period": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "period", + "days_expected", + "days_with_data", + "coverage_percent", + "missing_days", + "metrics", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "range", - "rows", - "truncated", - "summary" -]New value: +[ + "range", + "rows", + "truncated", + "summary", + "coverage" +]
7 tool updates
- Changed
calculate_metric_trend2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "range", - "trend" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "range", + "trend", + "evidence" +]
- Changed
compare_metric_periods3 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / period_a_evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / period_b_evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "period_a", - "period_b", - "period_a_stats", - "period_b_stats" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "period_a", + "period_b", + "period_a_stats", + "period_b_stats", + "period_a_evidence", + "period_b_evidence" +]
- Changed
detect_metric_anomalies2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "range", - "threshold", - "anomalies" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "range", + "threshold", + "anomalies", + "evidence" +]
- Changed
explain_metric_change5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / baseline_evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / properties / evidence_aAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / correlated_metrics / items / properties / evidence_bAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / trend_evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "date", - "baseline_range", - "baseline", - "is_anomaly", - "trend", - "correlated_metrics", - "narrative_facts" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "date", + "baseline_range", + "baseline", + "is_anomaly", + "trend", + "correlated_metrics", + "narrative_facts", + "baseline_evidence", + "trend_evidence" +]
- Changed
find_metric_correlation2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / evidence_aAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / evidence_bAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +}
- Changed
get_baseline2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "range", - "baseline" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "range", + "baseline", + "evidence" +]
- Changed
get_metric_history2 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / evidenceAdded value: +{ + "description": "Coverage/quality of the data a single-metric analytical result is\nbased on. See evidence.build_evidence for how each field is computed.", + "properties": { + "confidence": { + "type": "string" + }, + "coverage_ratio": { + "type": "number" + }, + "expected_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "freshness_days": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "gaps": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start", + "end", + "days" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + "measurement_count": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "missing_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "observed_end": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "observed_start": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "recent_gap_days": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "requested_end": { + "type": "string" + }, + "requested_start": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "requested_start", + "requested_end", + "expected_days", + "observed_days", + "coverage_ratio", + "missing_days", + "measurement_count", + "gaps", + "recent_gap_days", + "confidence" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "metric", - "range", - "points" -]New value: +[ + "metric", + "range", + "points", + "evidence" +]
27 tool updates
v1.0.16- Added
aggregate_measurements - Added
calculate_metric_trend - Removed
clear_daily_metric - Removed
clear_daily_metrics_range - Added
clear_metric - Added
compare_metric_periods - Removed
delete_measurement - Removed
delete_workout - Added
detect_metric_anomalies - Added
explain_metric_change - Added
export_health_data_csv - Added
find_metric_correlation - Added
get_baseline - Added
get_metric_history - Added
get_metric_provenance - Added
get_recent_changes - Changed
log_daily_metric15 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / date / descriptionAdded value: +"The day to log, formatted YYYY-MM-DD." - added
Input schema / properties / heart_rateAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Non-resting heart rate reading in bpm. 20-250." +} - added
Input schema / properties / hrv_msAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Heart rate variability in milliseconds. 0-300." +} - added
Input schema / properties / moodAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Mood rating on a 1-10 scale." +} - added
Input schema / properties / resting_heart_rate / descriptionAdded value: +"Resting heart rate in bpm. 20-250." - added
Input schema / properties / sleep_hours / descriptionAdded value: +"Hours of sleep. 0-24." - added
Input schema / properties / steps / descriptionAdded value: +"Step count for the day. 0-200,000." - added
Input schema / properties / water_mlAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Water intake in millilitres. 0-10,000." +} - added
Input schema / properties / weight_kgAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Body weight in kilograms. 1-500." +} - added
Input schema / properties / workout_minutesAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Minutes of exercise. 0-1,440." +} - added
Output schema / properties / loggedAdded value: +{ + "additionalProperties": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "number" + } + ] + }, + "type": "object" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Output schema / properties / rowAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "hrv_ms": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "logged", + "row" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
- Changed
log_measurement14 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / dateRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / metricAdded value: +{ + "description": "Name of the metric, e.g. \"resting_heart_rate\", \"steps\".\nFree-form โ not limited to daily_metrics' fixed columns.", + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / metric_nameRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / notesRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null -} - added
Input schema / properties / sourceAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Where this came from, e.g. \"Apple Watch\", \"manual\". Optional." +} - added
Input schema / properties / source_typeAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Category of source, e.g. \"wearable\", \"manual\", \"app\". Optional." +} - added
Input schema / properties / timestampAdded value: +{ + "description": "When the observation was taken, YYYY-MM-DD or a full\nISO 8601 timestamp (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS).", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / unit / descriptionAdded value: +"Unit the value is in, e.g. \"bpm\", \"kg\". Optional." - added
Input schema / properties / value / descriptionAdded value: +"The numeric reading." - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "date", - "metric_name", - "value" -]New value: +[ + "timestamp", + "metric", + "value" +] - added
Output schema / properties / measurementAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "created_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "id": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "metric": { + "type": "string" + }, + "source": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "source_type": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "timestamp": { + "type": "string" + }, + "unit": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "value": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "timestamp", + "metric", + "value", + "created_at" + ], + "type": "object" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "measurement" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
- Removed
log_workout - Added
log_workout_session - Removed
read_finance_data - Changed
read_health_data9 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / end_date / descriptionAdded value: +"Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today." - added
Input schema / properties / start_date / descriptionAdded value: +"First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD.\nDefaults to 30 days before end_date. Ranges over ~10 years are rejected." - added
Output schema / properties / rangeAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "end_date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start_date": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start_date", + "end_date" + ], + "type": "object" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Output schema / properties / rowsAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "hrv_ms": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" +} - added
Output schema / properties / summaryAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "days_with_data": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "heart_rate": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "hrv_ms": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "mood": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "steps": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "water_ml": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "weight_kg": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "days_with_data", + "steps", + "sleep_hours", + "resting_heart_rate", + "weight_kg", + "workout_minutes", + "mood", + "water_ml", + "heart_rate", + "hrv_ms" + ], + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "range", + "rows", + "truncated", + "summary" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
- Added
read_measurements - Added
read_workout_sessions - Removed
update_daily_metric - Removed
update_measurement - Removed
update_workout
27 tool updates
v1.0.15- Removed
aggregate_measurements - Removed
calculate_metric_trend - Added
clear_daily_metric - Added
clear_daily_metrics_range - Removed
clear_metric - Removed
compare_metric_periods - Added
delete_measurement - Added
delete_workout - Removed
detect_metric_anomalies - Removed
explain_metric_change - Removed
export_health_data_csv - Removed
find_metric_correlation - Removed
get_baseline - Removed
get_metric_history - Removed
get_metric_provenance - Removed
get_recent_changes - Changed
log_daily_metric15 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / date / descriptionRemoved value: -"The day to log, formatted YYYY-MM-DD." - removed
Input schema / properties / heart_rateRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Non-resting heart rate reading in bpm. 20-250." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / hrv_msRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Heart rate variability in milliseconds. 0-300." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / moodRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Mood rating on a 1-10 scale." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / resting_heart_rate / descriptionRemoved value: -"Resting heart rate in bpm. 20-250." - removed
Input schema / properties / sleep_hours / descriptionRemoved value: -"Hours of sleep. 0-24." - removed
Input schema / properties / steps / descriptionRemoved value: -"Step count for the day. 0-200,000." - removed
Input schema / properties / water_mlRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Water intake in millilitres. 0-10,000." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / weight_kgRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Body weight in kilograms. 1-500." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / workout_minutesRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Minutes of exercise. 0-1,440." -} - removed
Output schema / properties / loggedRemoved value: -{ - "additionalProperties": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "number" - } - ] - }, - "type": "object" -} - added
Output schema / properties / resultAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / rowRemoved value: -{ - "properties": { - "date": { - "type": "string" - }, - "heart_rate": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "hrv_ms": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "mood": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "resting_heart_rate": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "sleep_hours": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "steps": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "water_ml": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "weight_kg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "workout_minutes": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "required": [ - "date" - ], - "type": "object" -} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "logged", - "row" -]New value: +[ + "result" +] - added
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultAdded value: +true
- Changed
log_measurement14 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / dateAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Input schema / properties / metricRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Name of the metric, e.g. \"resting_heart_rate\", \"steps\".\nFree-form โ not limited to daily_metrics' fixed columns.", - "type": "string" -} - added
Input schema / properties / metric_nameAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / notesAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - removed
Input schema / properties / sourceRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Where this came from, e.g. \"Apple Watch\", \"manual\". Optional." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / source_typeRemoved value: -{ - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null, - "description": "Category of source, e.g. \"wearable\", \"manual\", \"app\". Optional." -} - removed
Input schema / properties / timestampRemoved value: -{ - "description": "When the observation was taken, YYYY-MM-DD or a full\nISO 8601 timestamp (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS).", - "type": "string" -} - removed
Input schema / properties / unit / descriptionRemoved value: -"Unit the value is in, e.g. \"bpm\", \"kg\". Optional." - removed
Input schema / properties / value / descriptionRemoved value: -"The numeric reading." - changed
Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "timestamp", - "metric", - "value" -]New value: +[ + "date", + "metric_name", + "value" +] - removed
Output schema / properties / measurementRemoved value: -{ - "properties": { - "created_at": { - "type": "string" - }, - "id": { - "type": "integer" - }, - "metric": { - "type": "string" - }, - "source": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "source_type": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "timestamp": { - "type": "string" - }, - "unit": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "value": { - "type": "number" - } - }, - "required": [ - "id", - "timestamp", - "metric", - "value", - "created_at" - ], - "type": "object" -} - added
Output schema / properties / resultAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "measurement" -]New value: +[ + "result" +] - added
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultAdded value: +true
- Added
log_workout - Removed
log_workout_session - Added
read_finance_data - Changed
read_health_data9 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / end_date / descriptionRemoved value: -"Last day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD. Defaults to today." - removed
Input schema / properties / start_date / descriptionRemoved value: -"First day to include, formatted YYYY-MM-DD.\nDefaults to 30 days before end_date. Ranges over ~10 years are rejected." - removed
Output schema / properties / rangeRemoved value: -{ - "properties": { - "end_date": { - "type": "string" - }, - "start_date": { - "type": "string" - } - }, - "required": [ - "start_date", - "end_date" - ], - "type": "object" -} - added
Output schema / properties / resultAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / rowsRemoved value: -{ - "items": { - "properties": { - "date": { - "type": "string" - }, - "heart_rate": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "hrv_ms": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "mood": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "resting_heart_rate": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "sleep_hours": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "steps": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "water_ml": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "weight_kg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "workout_minutes": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "required": [ - "date" - ], - "type": "object" - }, - "type": "array" -} - removed
Output schema / properties / summaryRemoved value: -{ - "properties": { - "days_with_data": { - "type": "integer" - }, - "heart_rate": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "hrv_ms": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "mood": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "resting_heart_rate": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "sleep_hours": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "steps": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "water_ml": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "weight_kg": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - }, - "workout_minutes": { - "properties": { - "avg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "max": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "min": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "type": "object" - } - }, - "required": [ - "days_with_data", - "steps", - "sleep_hours", - "resting_heart_rate", - "weight_kg", - "workout_minutes", - "mood", - "water_ml", - "heart_rate", - "hrv_ms" - ], - "type": "object" -} - removed
Output schema / properties / truncatedRemoved value: -{ - "type": "boolean" -} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "range", - "rows", - "truncated", - "summary" -]New value: +[ + "result" +] - added
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultAdded value: +true
- Removed
read_measurements - Removed
read_workout_sessions - Added
update_daily_metric - Added
update_measurement - Added
update_workout
3 tool updates
v0.3.0- Changed
explain_metric_change1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / sessionsAdded value: +{ + "default": [], + "items": { + "properties": { + "activity_type": { + "type": "string" + }, + "avg_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "created_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "duration_minutes": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "id": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "intensity": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "notes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "source": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "start_time": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "date", + "activity_type", + "duration_minutes", + "created_at" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" +}
- Added
log_workout_session - Added
read_workout_sessions
16 tool updates
v1.0.11- Added
aggregate_measurements - Added
calculate_metric_trend - Changed
clear_metric2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / field / descriptionPrevious value: -"Which metric to blank out. One of: steps, sleep_hours,\nresting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml."New value: +"Which metric to blank out. One of: steps, sleep_hours,\nresting_heart_rate, weight_kg, workout_minutes, mood, water_ml, heart_rate, hrv_ms." - changed
Output schema / properties / row / anyOfPrevious value: -[ - { - "properties": { - "date": { - "type": "string" - }, - "mood": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "resting_heart_rate": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "sleep_hours": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "steps": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "water_ml": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "weight_kg": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "number" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - }, - "workout_minutes": { - "anyOf": [ - { - "type": "integer" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } - ], - "default": null - } - }, - "required": [ - "date" - ], - "type": "object" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "hrv_ms": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +]
- Added
compare_metric_periods - Added
detect_metric_anomalies - Added
explain_metric_change - Added
export_health_data_csv - Added
find_metric_correlation - Added
get_baseline - Added
get_metric_history - Added
get_metric_provenance - Added
get_recent_changes - Changed
log_daily_metric4 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / heart_rateAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Non-resting heart rate reading in bpm. 20-250." +} - added
Input schema / properties / hrv_msAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Heart rate variability in milliseconds. 0-300." +} - added
Output schema / properties / row / properties / heart_rateAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / row / properties / hrv_msAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +}
- Added
log_measurement - Changed
read_health_data5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / rows / items / properties / heart_rateAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / rows / items / properties / hrv_msAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - added
Output schema / properties / summary / properties / heart_rateAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / summary / properties / hrv_msAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / properties / summary / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "days_with_data", - "steps", - "sleep_hours", - "resting_heart_rate", - "weight_kg", - "workout_minutes", - "mood", - "water_ml" -]New value: +[ + "days_with_data", + "steps", + "sleep_hours", + "resting_heart_rate", + "weight_kg", + "workout_minutes", + "mood", + "water_ml", + "heart_rate", + "hrv_ms" +]
- Added
read_measurements
3 tool updates
v1.0.8- Changed
clear_metric6 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / clearedAdded value: +{ + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / noteAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Output schema / properties / rowAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "cleared" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
- Changed
log_daily_metric5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / loggedAdded value: +{ + "additionalProperties": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "number" + } + ] + }, + "type": "object" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Output schema / properties / rowAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "logged", + "row" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
- Changed
read_health_data7 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / rangeAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "end_date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "start_date": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "start_date", + "end_date" + ], + "type": "object" +} - removed
Output schema / properties / resultRemoved value: -{ - "type": "string" -} - added
Output schema / properties / rowsAdded value: +{ + "items": { + "properties": { + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "mood": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "steps": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "water_ml": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "weight_kg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "integer" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "required": [ + "date" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" +} - added
Output schema / properties / summaryAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "days_with_data": { + "type": "integer" + }, + "mood": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "resting_heart_rate": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "sleep_hours": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "steps": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "water_ml": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "weight_kg": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "workout_minutes": { + "properties": { + "avg": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "max": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + }, + "min": { + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null + } + }, + "type": "object" + } + }, + "required": [ + "days_with_data", + "steps", + "sleep_hours", + "resting_heart_rate", + "weight_kg", + "workout_minutes", + "mood", + "water_ml" + ], + "type": "object" +} - added
Output schema / properties / truncatedAdded value: +{ + "type": "boolean" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "result" -]New value: +[ + "range", + "rows", + "truncated", + "summary" +] - removed
Output schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-resultRemoved value: -true
2 tool updates
v1.0.4- Added
clear_metric - Added
log_daily_metric
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action-resource pair: logging vs reading vs analyzing, and daily metrics vs raw measurements vs workout sessions vs cross-metric analytics. The descriptions reinforce this with explicit 'use when' / 'do not use when' cross-references that point to the correct alternative, so no two tools genuinely overlap.
All 18 tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, with stable verb groups (log_*, read_*, get_*, calculate_, compare_, find_, detect_, explain_, clear_, aggregate_, export_). This makes the set highly predictable and easy to navigate.
At 18 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 band, but the count is justified by the domain's breadth: logging, reading, measurement provenance, and analytics each form a coherent cluster. No tool feels redundant, though the total is on the heavier side.
The server covers the full lifecycle for daily metrics (log, read, clear, export) and provides a rich analytics surface including baseline, trend, anomalies, correlation, period comparison, and an explainable-change bundle. The notable gap is the inability to delete or update logged workout sessions, and no direct update path for measurements, but these are workable limitations.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
- Era ContextOAuthapp.era
Personal finance, bank account, and shared memory connector for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini Spark & more
Query 40 databases from Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor โ on any device. Read-only, encrypted, audited.
Your personal data for AI โ Telegram, bank, courses, Zoom & more, scoped to you.
Ask data questions in natural language. Get SQL, insights, and charts from your databases.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows users to query and analyze their Apple Health data using SQL and natural language, utilizing DuckDB for fast and efficient health data analysis.2373 npm568MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLoads Apple Health export data into a local SQLite database and exposes tools to query health metrics and workout records via natural language.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying personal data synced from services like Lunch Money and Strava using SQL via Claude.15 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with local SQLite databases with full CRUD, schema introspection, foreign key relations, generated columns, and multi-format import/export (CSV, JSON, XLSX) through natural language.2610 npmMIT