update_mcp_integration_workspaces

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description notes that changes take effect immediately and implies mutation. With no annotation contradiction, it adds some behavioral context but lacks details on whether existing access is replaced or added, and does not cover reversibility or permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose and a key usage tip. Every sentence is meaningful without any superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a tool with two well-described parameters and an output schema. However, it could benefit from explaining whether the operation is additive or replaces existing workspace access.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so parameters are already well-documented. The description adds minimal extra meaning beyond stating the bulk nature of the operation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it grants or revokes workspace access to an MCP integration in bulk. It distinguishes from sibling tools by focusing on workspace access for MCP integrations, though it does not explicitly compare to similar tools like update_integration_workspaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using list_mcp_integration_workspaces first, which is a helpful guideline. However, it does not specify when not to use this tool or mention alternative tools for different scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.