e-Gov Law MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to e-Gov Law MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Japanese legal information from the e-Gov Law API, including law searches by keyword, detailed law data retrieval, and revision history tracking.31,846 npm48MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSearches and retrieves Japanese national legislation from the official e-Gov API, providing verifiable citations with stable URLs and human-readable references.632 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLMs to search and retrieve Japanese laws from the e-Gov API v2, including keyword search, article fetching, table of contents, and revision history.72,726 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceFull-text search across all ~10,000 current Japanese laws and regulations (official e-Gov data): keyword search, table of contents, and exact article text.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying Japanese national laws and ordinances via the e-Gov Law API, allowing AI agents to access legal data through natural language questions.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching and retrieving Japanese laws from the e-Gov API, enabling natural language queries for legal information.34 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between search_laws and search_laws_by_keyword, which could cause confusion about when to use each. The batch_find_articles and find_law_article tools also serve similar functions but are differentiated by batch vs. single operations, which is reasonably clear.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structure (e.g., find_law_article, get_cache_stats, search_laws). This consistency makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its domain of Japanese law lookup and search. Each tool has a clear role, covering operations like searching, fetching, caching, and batch processing without being overwhelming.
The toolset provides strong coverage for law lookup and search, including single and batch article retrieval, full-text search, and caching utilities. A minor gap is the lack of update or delete operations, but this is reasonable given the domain of static law data.