Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agentic Wallet Guardian

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
    3
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Security layer for AI agents that evaluates transaction intents and returns verdicts (ALLOW/WARN/DENY) using deterministic rules, on-chain checks, and simulation.
    1 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to analyze Ethereum wallets, simulate transactions, and draft transfers with deterministic policy and risk scoring, requiring human approval before on-chain execution.
    7 npm
    ISC
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Cryptographic proof of consent for AI agents. Sign before you act. Policy engine enforces spending caps, action whitelists, and escalation rules. Independently verifiable by anyone.
    10
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to propose wallet payments while a local, human-authored policy decides whether each transaction is approved, requires human confirmation, or is refused, and records every decision in a signed, append-only ledger.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to execute on-chain transactions through policy validation, KeeperHub orchestration, and tamper-evident evidence recording.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides a three-layer payment firewall for AI agents, enabling identity verification, risk screening, and execution authorization with on-chain policy enforcement for secure and auditable transactions.
    213 npm
    2
    MIT

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one evaluates a proposed action, the other retrieves an agent's decision history. No overlap exists between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern (evaluate_action, get_agent_history), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels thin for a watchdog service. While the focus is narrow, users might expect additional management or reporting tools, making it borderline.

Completeness4/5

The core lifecycle of evaluating an action and reviewing past decisions is covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit policy management or post-execution reporting, but these are not critical for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues