Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agentic Wallet Guardian

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
    3
    19 PyPI
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Security layer for AI agents that evaluates transaction intents and returns verdicts (ALLOW/WARN/DENY) using deterministic rules, on-chain checks, and simulation.
    9 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to analyze Ethereum wallets, simulate transactions, and draft transfers with deterministic policy and risk scoring, requiring human approval before on-chain execution.
    10 npm
    ISC
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Cryptographic proof of consent for AI agents. Sign before you act. Policy engine enforces spending caps, action whitelists, and escalation rules. Independently verifiable by anyone.
    10
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to score Solana tokens, simulate and decode transactions, and apply owner-defined limits, allowlists and slippage rules before anything is signed, returning a clear allow, confirm, block or freeze verdict. Also supports on-chain enforcement through a Squads multisig so an agent can propose trades but only execute when the gateway approves, with a kill-switch and owner approval flows for risky actions.
    13 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enforces a policy ladder for Solana AI agents so on-chain actions are vetted before signing, checking whether an action is justified, recently repeated, or targets only known programs, and applying spend, daily, and slippage caps plus recipient allowlists. Also dry-runs candidate transactions on an RPC and exposes the policy rules as agent prompt instructions.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables autonomous agents and multi-agent frameworks to route actions through deterministic human approval gates before execution. Enforces risk tiers, reversible checkpoints, and token approval bounds so that risky or costly operations can be reviewed, bounded, and rolled back without LLM round-trips.
    7
    -

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one evaluates a proposed action, the other retrieves an agent's decision history. No overlap exists between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern (evaluate_action, get_agent_history), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels thin for a watchdog service. While the focus is narrow, users might expect additional management or reporting tools, making it borderline.

Completeness4/5

The core lifecycle of evaluating an action and reviewing past decisions is covered. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit policy management or post-execution reporting, but these are not critical for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues