Skip to main content
Glama
rpint

ckd-parent-guide-mcp

by rpint

Related Servers

Alternatives to ckd-parent-guide-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server generates individualized meal plans for children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on KDIGO 2024/PRNT 2020/KRCP 2025 guidelines, incorporating patient age, CKD stage, allergies, dietary culture, and diet diary analysis. It provides deterministic nutrient computations and tools for meal plan generation, food database lookup, and risk analysis.
      13
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Generates multi-day CKD meal plans for children based on PRNT targets (energy, protein, potassium, phosphorus, sodium), providing nutrient summaries and target achievement rates for dietitians.
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables pediatric CKD nutrition assessment by calculating PRNT energy/protein targets, evaluating dietary intake against those targets, and screening for PEW risk, with support for dialysis, vegetarian diets, and edema corrections.
      5
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for pediatric CKD follow-up management, providing tools to schedule follow-ups based on KDIGO 2024 guidelines, retrieve follow-up records, compute adherence scores, and access PEW history.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Mock MCP server for pediatric CKD risk warning, enabling patient biochemical trend retrieval, deterministic risk rule evaluation, structured alert triggering, and clinical SOP lookup using simulated data.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but interpret_lab_report, explain_terms, and translate_doctor_note all deal with explaining medical information and could be confused. search_faq and list_faq_topics also overlap, though each has a clear role. Overall, the purposes are distinguishable but not always obvious.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: some are verb-first (can_eat, find_substitutes, interpret_lab_report) while others are noun-phrases (cooking_tips, daily_standards, ckd_stage_overview, egfr_calculator). This mixed convention reduces predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for a parent guide covering food safety, lab interpretation, education, and cooking. The count feels appropriate and each tool earns its place; it is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers key parent needs: food safety checks, substitutions, lab report interpretation, FAQ retrieval, cooking tips, daily standards, stage overview, and eGFR calculation. A notable gap is the lack of dedicated medication or supplement guidance, but overall the set is complete for its apparent focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing