CloudOps MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CloudOps MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Alibaba Cloud resources via natural language, with explicit tools for common services and a universal API invoker for full cloud coverage.92-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI tools to perform server operations such as log inspection, system monitoring, code management, Nginx and certificate management, with support for local and remote SSH modes and built-in security controls.23200MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with cloud-based execution environments through Alibaba Cloud's Wuying infrastructure, enabling browser automation, file operations, and terminal access in secure, serverless cloud environments.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with natural language control over AWS, Azure, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud infrastructure through dynamic API discovery and execution. Supports 51,900+ cloud operations and includes OpenTofu integration for complete infrastructure lifecycle management.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Coolify infrastructure including servers, applications, databases, deployments, and 80+ one-click services through 98 comprehensive tools for both cloud and self-hosted instances.MIT

MileHost MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to manage cloud containers, create and edit files, run commands, and deploy projects directly.247MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools are grouped by clear prefixes (server_, file_, dns_, cos_) and target distinct resources/actions. The only mild risk is the COS bucket-read cluster (get_acl, get_policy, check_public_read), where purposes overlap though descriptions differentiate them.
The set follows a consistent [domain]_[operation] pattern in snake_case, such as dns_create_record and cdn_list_domains. Minor deviations like deploy_project (verb+object) and deploy_status (noun) keep it from being perfect.
At 26 tools, this is on the heavy side, but the multi-domain scope (servers, deploy, DB, DNS, CDN, COS) means the count is borderline rather than excessive. Each tool has a clear function, though some consolidation could reduce the total.
The server covers core operations across its advertised domains: files, deployment, DB queries, DNS records, CDN refresh, and COS security audit/remediation. Gaps such as DNS record update, server removal, and file delete/upload are missing but can be worked around via existing tools or direct exec.