Update Live Call Router

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the name, such as whether the update is partial or full, what permissions are required, or what side effects occur.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted clauses. It is concise and readable, though "specific" is slightly redundant and the sentence is thinner than ideal for a complex update tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema and annotations exist, the description is not complete enough for a nested update tool. It omits whether omitted attributes remain unchanged, how the data wrapper works, and any update-specific behavioral constraints, leaving the agent to infer these from the schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description only repeats the id/path concept, which the schema already documents in detail. With schema description coverage at 50%, the top-level required data object is not explained, and the description does not compensate by clarifying its wrapper structure or update semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: "Update a specific Live Call Router by id." This clearly separates it from get/list/create siblings by the action verb, though it does not explicitly name alternatives or describe which attributes are mutable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternatives. It only implies usage through "Update... by id" and never explains when an agent should choose this over get_live_call_router, list_live_call_routers, or create_live_call_router.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.