Update Form Set Condition

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare that this is a non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive operation with open-world behavior. The description adds no further behavioral context such as partial-update semantics, required permissions, or what happens to omitted attributes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. It is appropriately sized for what it attempts to convey, even though other dimensions show it is under-informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and annotations cover the safety profile, so the description does not need to explain return values or basic mutability. However, for a nested mutation tool with only 50% schema description coverage, the terse description leaves the data payload and practical update behavior underspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50%, so the description should compensate for the undocumented parts of the nested data object. Instead it only restates that the resource is identified by id and says nothing about the required data payload or its attributes.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: update a form_set_condition identified by id. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not distinguish it from nearby siblings such as get_form_set_condition, update_form_set, or update_form_field_placement_condition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It says only to update by id, with no guidance on when to use this instead of creating, reading, or updating a related form-set resource. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or named alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.