Skip to main content
Glama
rom-baro

@arcwall/mcp-server

by rom-baro

Related Servers

Alternatives to @arcwall/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agentic security scanning in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real security scanners for AI coding agents — SAST (441 rules), secret detection (419+ patterns), dependency CVEs (OSV.dev), MCP/skill vetting, MITRE ATT&CK. Open-source, Rust, free
      14 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
      1
      4 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A security scanner for AI coding agents and autonomous assistants that scans code for vulnerabilities, detects hallucinated packages, blocks prompt injection, and provides LLM-powered semantic code review via MCP or CLI.
      22
      654 npm
      122
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automatically detects security vulnerabilities in AI-generated code, scanning for hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, XSS, weak cryptography, authentication issues, path traversal, and vulnerable dependencies across JavaScript, Python, Java, and Go.
      19 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct security concern: prompt injections, pre-commit checks, agent instructions, dependencies, MCP configs, secrets, and threat modeling. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'arcwall_' prefix and use descriptive verb-noun or noun phrases. Minor inconsistency: 'check' vs 'scan' verbs, but overall pattern is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools cover the essential scanning and security assessment needs for a development workflow. The count is well-scoped without being too few or too many.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers major security scanning areas (prompts, secrets, dependencies, configs). Minor omission might be runtime monitoring, but the set is fairly complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues