patch_system_backups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotations already provide. It does not mention side effects such as overwriting current system state, whether a service restart is needed, or any restrictions. There is no contradiction with the annotations, but there is also no added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short sentences and contains no filler. The endpoint and parameter list are useful references. It is slightly under-specified, but as a concise statement it is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a restore operation, an agent would benefit from knowing that the filename likely corresponds to an existing backup (e.g., from list_system_backups) and that restoring may replace current data. The description provides no such context. Although the tool is simple, the lack of warnings or usage context makes it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must clarify the parameter. The line 'filename: Backups to restore filename' essentially restates the parameter name and provides minimal semantic value. It does not explain what format the filename should take or how it relates to existing backup records.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Restore a backup file,' a specific verb and resource that clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like create_system_backups, delete_system_backups, and list_system_backups. The endpoint and name reinforce exactly what operation is performed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as create_system_backups or list_system_backups. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or conditions that would help an agent choose this tool correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.