create_plex_oauth_logout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond the raw endpoint. It does not mention what the logout invalidates, whether authentication is required, or what side effects occur. It does not contradict the annotations, but it contributes nothing extra.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, but it contains redundant information: 'POST plex/oauth/logout' and 'POST /api/plex/oauth/logout' say essentially the same thing. It is concise but not efficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter endpoint with an output schema and annotations, the invocation surface is simple and the exact URI is provided. However, the description lacks the intended effect and any relation to the broader OAuth flow, so an agent must infer when and why to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and the schema coverage is 100%, so there is no parameter documentation burden. The description correctly implies no arguments are needed by only specifying the endpoint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description provides the exact HTTP method and endpoint, 'POST /api/plex/oauth/logout', which identifies a specific resource and distinguishes it from sibling Plex OAuth tools by path. However, it never states the semantic effect, such as 'invalidates the current Plex OAuth session', and largely echoes the tool name and endpoint without adding meaning.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_plex_oauth_pin or create_plex_select_server. The description only repeats the endpoint and gives no context for when a logout operation is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.