SportIntel MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to SportIntel MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides betting intelligence and analytics tools including exposure, CLV, sharp scoring, live betting, and Fantasy402 integration, running on Cloudflare Edge.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProps-first sports odds API with a hosted MCP server. Live odds and player props (moneyline, spreads, totals) across US sportsbooks, normalized to JSON. Tools: get_odds, get_props, get_events, get_books. API-key auth, free tier.MIT No Attribution
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with sports model win probabilities and fair odds across nine sports without requiring an API key.360 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents and sportsbooks to discover, evaluate, and monitor alternative sports leagues with tools for discovery, valuation, fingerprinting, and market data.35MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn open NFL fantasy-football analytics platform that provides live data, machine-learned projections, dynasty values, and prospect grades via an MCP server for AI clients.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI-powered sports betting intelligence including live odds, injury reports, and documented picks for NBA, NHL, and NCAAB. It enables AI agents to analyze line movements, win rates, and betting edges using real-time data from sportsbettingaianalyzer.com.1124 PyPI5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: explain_recommendation focuses on model explainability, get_live_odds on betting odds, get_player_projections on player forecasts, and optimize_lineup on lineup construction. The descriptions reinforce these unique roles, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (explain_recommendation, get_live_odds, get_player_projections, optimize_lineup) with clear, descriptive verbs. There are no deviations in style or convention, ensuring predictable and readable naming throughout the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a sports analytics server, covering key areas like projections, odds, explainability, and optimization. It's slightly lean but well-scoped; adding tools for historical data or team-level analysis could enhance completeness without being necessary.
The tools provide solid coverage for DFS and betting workflows, including projection generation, odds retrieval, lineup optimization, and model explainability. Minor gaps exist, such as missing historical performance data or team-level projections, but agents can work effectively with the current surface for core tasks.