Skip to main content
Glama
rohittrimale

Mainframe MCP Server

by rohittrimale
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mainframe MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TD/OMS MCP

      ashishthomas2202
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server for TD/OMS change management that connects directly to TD/OMS REST APIs and enables workflow planning, execution, and monitoring for IBM i development tools.
      15 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-rs232

      daedalus
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes RS232 serial port connectivity, enabling listing, opening, reading, and writing to serial ports via tools and resources.
      6
      MIT

    • Redmine MCP Server

      GonzaloRando03
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Redmine project management, enabling tools for managing projects, issues, users, time entries, groups, memberships, versions, wiki, news, attachments, search, and Agile sprints via the Redmine REST API.
      89
      3 npm
      1
      MIT

    • adt-mcp

      nhattuan1305
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Multi-system MCP server for reading and writing ABAP source via SAP ADT, with write safety controls and a local web admin.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools follow a clear get_<artifact> pattern (COBOL, copybook, CT1, JCL, PROC), and the job-status/spool tools are distinct. However, generic get_content overlaps heavily with the specialized getters, and get_jcl vs get_job_jcl plus upload_member vs modify_module create potential confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names overwhelmingly use snake_case verb_noun, with clear verbs like get, submit, create, delete. Minor inconsistencies exist (get_cobol vs get_content, search_seq_datasets uses an abbreviation, create_dataset_like) but the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 30 tools, the server is over-scoped for a coherent set. Many specialized getters could be consolidated into get_content, and the job-spool area has four overlapping tools. A more focused set of 15-20 would be stronger.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers dataset lifecycle (create, delete, rename, recall, copy, modify), source retrieval, and full job submission/status/spool flow. Missing member-level deletion and a direct list-members operation are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources