Skip to main content
Glama
roclee2692

ielts-review-lab

by roclee2692
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ielts-review-lab

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • maimemo

      ryukirin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only mirroring of your vocabulary learning data into a local SQLite database and provides daily multiple-choice quiz sessions with explanations, mistake tracking, and generated daily reports.
      MIT

    • learndeck

      learn-deck
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted learning through structured courses with Socratic guidance, evaluating user answers against rubrics and managing learning progress locally.
      Apache 2.0

    • Study Errorbook

      SAKURAfan1023
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to import PDFs, photos, and exam papers through local stdio MCP tools, using TextIn OCR to build a versioned wrong-answer bank that keeps original evidence and image crops for human review. Supports retrieval, revision history, practice attempts, dated review queues, and printable offline HTML exports of error notebooks, student workbooks, and answer books.
      32
      MIT

    • English Coach MCP

      gadshushan3030
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to act as the memory of a personal English-learning app: read progress and words due for review, run short practice conversations, and store sentences, corrections, new words, rubric scores, and checked exercises back to the user's dashboard. Also lets the assistant grow the flashcard deck and adjust word familiarity, which reschedules spaced-repetition reviews.
      MIT

    • stil-lint

      fredrsat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables automated agents and writers to check Norwegian and English prose before sending, returning concrete style findings, revision hints, and verdicts instead of authorship claims, with a no-judgment band, positive quality checks, a private local mode, and phrase-bank memory.
      MIT

    • kaoyan-mcp

      hanserdesu
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to act as a personal exam-prep tutor for Chinese postgraduate entrance exams, with a local knowledge base, spaced-repetition review scheduling, worksheet generation and delivery (print/PDF/HTML/text), and learning analytics—all with zero third-party dependencies and data staying local.
      14
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the ingest→judge→review→report workflow, so an agent can generally pick the right one. The closest pair is set_cause (confirming a wrong-answer cause) versus submit_explanation (writing an explanation), and weakness versus today (analytics vs. daily plan), which could occasionally be confused but descriptions clarify.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (ingest_passage, judge_set, submit_explanation, mark_reviewed, list_sets), but several are bare nouns (weakness, today, report, method). The split between action verbs and noun-styled tools is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a real step in the study/review lifecycle. No obviously redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers ingestion, deterministic grading, cause tagging, explanation authoring, analytics, review scheduling, reporting, and method management—a near-complete lifecycle. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete/edit-set operation or a way to fetch a single set's full detail beyond list_sets, but these are workaroundable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources