mcp-latchpoint
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_rulesA | List stable audit rule IDs, severity, descriptions, and remediation. |
| scanC | Scan a config file or directory inside the server's allowed root. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
list_rules enumerates audit rules while scan analyzes a config file or directory—two clearly distinct purposes targeting different objects (rule metadata vs. actual files). No overlap or confusion.
list_rules follows a clean verb_noun pattern, but scan is a bare verb without a noun target, a minor deviation from the convention. Still readable and predictable overall.
Two tools is borderline thin for an audit/lint server; listing rules and running a scan are essential, but the surface feels minimal for the apparent scanning domain.
The core discover-then-scan workflow exists, but there's no way to fetch a single rule's detail, filter by severity, or apply/view remediation beyond what list_rules returns. Notable gaps limit deeper audit workflows.