Skip to main content
Glama
robyroro

mcp-latchpoint

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-latchpoint

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Tracks buying and momentum signals for companies, such as funding rounds, senior hires, office openings, customer wins, and partnerships, with each event carrying its date.
    10
    15 npm
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Audits MCP server configurations and packages for security risks such as typosquats, credential exposure, and malicious code, with zero dependencies and no execution.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Audits MCP server configurations for security risks including capability inventory, SSRF, prompt injection, and drift detection. Works in read-only mode and can also be used as an MCP server to let AI agents audit their own attack surface.
    98 PyPI
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Security scanning for MCP servers from the inside out. Provides runtime inspection, AST-based static analysis, config audit, dependency analysis, and OWASP MCP Top 10 compliance in a single MCP server.
    55
    189 npm
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables scanning MCP server configurations for security risks like prompt injection, hardcoded secrets, and dangerous commands, providing risk scores and detailed reports before connecting to an AI coding assistant.
    11 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Scans MCP servers for prompt-injection, tool-poisoning, and SSRF vulnerabilities using 30+ canonical rules across 5 severity tiers, with optional signed safety reports for procurement.
    5
    MIT

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

list_rules enumerates audit rules while scan analyzes a config file or directory—two clearly distinct purposes targeting different objects (rule metadata vs. actual files). No overlap or confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

list_rules follows a clean verb_noun pattern, but scan is a bare verb without a noun target, a minor deviation from the convention. Still readable and predictable overall.

Tool Count3/5

Two tools is borderline thin for an audit/lint server; listing rules and running a scan are essential, but the surface feels minimal for the apparent scanning domain.

Completeness3/5

The core discover-then-scan workflow exists, but there's no way to fetch a single rule's detail, filter by severity, or apply/view remediation beyond what list_rules returns. Notable gaps limit deeper audit workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues