Skip to main content
Glama
rnd-pro

project-graph-mcp

by rnd-pro
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to project-graph-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-context-condenser

      rafim-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to reduce token usage by condensing source code into AST skeletons, extracting specific symbols, compressing logs, and estimating token budgets.
      4
      MIT

    • redcon

      natiixnt
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Deterministic repository context packing for AI coding agents: selects, compresses, and budgets only the files a task needs. Measured 83% fewer input tokens at the same task coverage, fully local, no LLM in the loop.
      9
      8
      -

    • projectmind

      Nodemint-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent, compact project memory for AI coding agents, enabling them to read a small digest instead of re-scanning the codebase every session, saving tokens and costs.
      68 npm
      2
      MIT

    • WashedMCP

      clarsbyte
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Token-optimized semantic code search with automatic context expansion for AI coding assistants, enabling efficient discovery of code relationships and reducing token usage.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct functional area: context provision, navigation, analysis, documentation, custom rules, testing, and caching. Even similar tools like get_skeleton and get_ai_context have clearly differentiated purposes (skeleton-only vs. full context), eliminating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mix single-word domain identifiers (docs, compact, db, jsdoc, navigate, analyze, testing, filters) with snake_case verb phrases (get_focus_zone, invalidate_cache, set_custom_rule). While descriptive, the lack of a uniform verb_noun or noun_verb pattern across all tools makes naming slightly inconsistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    The 19 tools are slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the server's broad scope (code graph navigation, analysis, documentation, testing, custom rules, AI context) justifies the count. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and no tool feels redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of codebase analysis and AI assistance: navigation, quality analysis, test tracking, documentation management, custom rules, and context generation. Minor gaps like a missing delete_custom_rule are workable and do not create dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources