Skip to main content
Glama
rhyne1012

OpenVSP MCP (Maintained Fork)

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenVSP MCP (Maintained Fork)

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for CPACS-oriented TiGL workflows, enabling lifecycle management, inspection, export, and parameter manipulation of aircraft geometry models without native geometry runtimes.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables running reproducible AVL 3.52 aerodynamic analyses through MCP, with input validation, isolated execution, sweeps, background jobs, and structured results including solver files.
      11
      GPL 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      CAD-engineering MCP tool server for parametric modeling, DFM validation, mechanical calculations, and more. Enables code-CAD builds (build123d/CadQuery), model inspection, meshing, and mechanical calculators via MCP stdio.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides pre-flight validation and post-processing tools for OpenMC Monte Carlo transport simulations, catching common authoring mistakes before jobs hit the HPC queue.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Descriptions meticulously cross-reference each other and carve out boundaries (preview/inspect/query, run_vspaero/sweep/batch_submit, set_parameters/modify, preflight/health), which strongly aids selection. However, genuine overlap remains between the edit tools (set_parameters vs modify) and the solving tools, requiring careful reading to distinguish rather than being self-evident.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent openvsp.<snake_case> namespace with no mixed casing or conventions. Most use a verb_noun form (run_vspaero, set_parameters, batch_submit), but several are bare single words (preview, preflight, health, query, inspect, sweep, modify), a minor deviation from a fully uniform pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is on the heavier side for the scope, but each earns its place: a batch lifecycle legitimately requires submit/status/cancel/resume/export, and health/inspect/query/preview cover distinct inspection levels. Slightly over but well-justified rather than redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: health readiness, XML/native inspection, model creation/modification, parameter edits, geometry preflight, preview export, single/sequential/batch solving, results reading, and batch export. Minor gaps like batch or model deletion are absent but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues