agy-headless-bridge MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to agy-headless-bridge MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLets MCP clients such as Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Codex hand tasks to the Antigravity CLI (agy) so the work runs on the user's Antigravity plan instead of the client's. Exposes tools for delegated coding tasks and reviews, web search with sources, image/PDF analysis, shell command generation or execution, brainstorming, and model/quota checks.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceBridges any MCP client to the official Antigravity agy CLI, letting users delegate tasks, analyze files, search code, look up docs, and request adversarial reviews from their own Antigravity subscription models. Supports dynamic model discovery, multi-turn session follow-up, and async long-running tasks without replacing the client's main model.101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to execute tasks via the Google Antigravity CLI (agy), exposing its models, skills, plugins, and background workers as native tools.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceWraps Google Antigravity CLI into 11 typed MCP tools, enabling any MCP client to invoke agy for code review, prototyping, execution, and long-running tasks.1156 PyPI26MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceWraps the Antigravity CLI (agy) as an MCP server, enabling Claude Code and other MCP clients to execute AI tasks and manage conversations via the agy command.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceWraps Google's Antigravity CLI as MCP tools for Claude, enabling cost-disciplined multi-model execution with background jobs and fan-out research/review pipelines.13MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
agy_ask and agy_research both send a prompt to the same Antigravity CLI and return a response, so the boundary is blurred: a user could fulfill research needs by calling agy_ask with a 'research this' prompt. The description hints at a depth/intent difference, but nothing structural distinguishes the two tools (no separate parameters, output shapes, or guarantees).
Both tools use the same agy_ prefix with a single lowercase snake_case verb (ask, research), forming a clean, predictable pattern. There is no mixing of conventions or verb styles.
Two tools is thin for a bridge server, and one of them (agy_research) appears to be a thin wrapper around the other, so the surface feels under-scoped rather than deliberately minimal. It is not extreme, but there is little room for distinct capability.
The server covers one-shot prompt delegation but lacks any session/multi-turn continuation, file or workspace context parameters, or status/cancel operations that a CLI bridge typically needs. Core workflow (ask something and get an answer) works, but agents will hit dead ends for stateful or long-running tasks.