Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Raven MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives LLMs deep knowledge of design systems and tokens, enabling intelligent design evolution, token analysis, and designer-to-developer handoffs.
      37
      13 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants structured access to a design system's tokens, components, guidelines, and patterns, enabling them to read, lint, and author design system data.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that drives Anthropic's Claude Design from agentic coding CLIs, providing tools to create, generate, iterate, and export design systems without a browser.
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables Claude to read, create, edit, and generate code from Figma designs. Supports design tokens, code generation to multiple frameworks, and accessibility checks.
      100
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for design decisions during a build, providing live UI/animation library docs (via llms.txt) and a curated knowledge base of UX laws and UI conventions. It enables agents to look up real component APIs and apply design best practices, running locally via stdio or hosted on Vercel.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes a design system and UX rulebook as tools, enabling AI to generate UI consistent with your design tokens, components, layout rules, accessibility guidelines, and templates. It also provides a review tool to score UI proposals against the design system.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 115 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The set contains many overlapping audit and evaluation tools, including `audit`, `audit_page`, `score_page`, `audit_url`, `talon_scan`, `design_gauntlet`, and numerous platform-specific audit variants. The `audit` description explicitly says to use it instead of choosing individual `audit_*` tools, which admits redundancy and makes tool selection confusing for an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools use readable snake_case and most follow a verb_noun pattern, such as `get_design_system`, `create_generation_job`, and `audit_contrast`. There are minor namespace inconsistencies (`raven_register`, `decision_*`, bare `audit`) but no chaotic mixed casing.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 115 tools, this is far beyond a well-scoped surface and creates an extreme mismatch for an agent using the server as a coherent toolkit. Many tools appear to be layered alternatives or niche variants that should be discoverable through fewer entry points.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is extremely broad, covering audits, design systems, taste calibration, references, motion, creative generation, and decision tracking. Some resource lifecycles lack obvious delete/update operations, but the major domains are well represented with only minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUsually handled