Evaluate how rigorously a scientific, biomedical, clinical, or AI/ML claim was derived, and how well the evidence supports it.

Use this whenever someone wants to assess, screen, sanity-check, or do due diligence on a research claim, a study, a paper, an abstract, a preprint, a grant or a pitch: whether the methodology is sound, whether the data was harmonized and controlled properly, whether the statistics hold, whether the result reproduces, and how well the public literature, clinical trials, and filings back it. It grades each evidence dimension and returns an overall reading with sources cited by hard id (PMID, DOI, NCT, NIH grant, SEC filing). Works for drug, omics, target-validation, diagnostic, and AI-model claims.

A screen is free and needs no token. A full attested dossier (deep) is the signed, independently re-checkable audit and needs access.

Args: claim: the claim to evaluate, in one or two sentences. context: optional background (stage, field, the decision at hand). documents: optional source text (a deck, abstract, or paper). depth: "screen" for a fast, free pass (no token needed), "deep" for the full attested dossier (needs access). mode: "research" (science only) or "diligence" (adds the capital reading); deep only.

Get the result of a full (deep) Zetesis dossier started earlier. Returns the reading and the rendered dossier link once it is ready.

Args: job_id: the id returned by evaluate_claim for a deep evaluation.

Verify a Zetesis attestation, confirming an evaluation's claim, evidence, and conclusion have not been altered since it was signed. Use when someone has a Zetesis dossier or attestation and wants to independently re-check it. No account needed.

Args: attestation_json: the full attestation object as JSON text.

Show the caller's Zetesis plan and remaining free evaluations or dossier credits.