hive-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to hive-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, write, and search local tldraw (.tldr) files, providing a persistent visual scratchpad for diagramming and note organization. It supports full CRUD operations on canvas shapes and metadata management for local canvas files.23 npm3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI models and browser users to collaboratively create and edit a shared freeform canvas of positioned cards and directed connections, with tools for adding, updating, linking, and exporting boards as JSON or SVG.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to visualize tasks on a collaborative Sketchbord whiteboard by composing content into diagrams, editing them incrementally, and reading back the board including user-drawn additions.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to inspect and edit the live browser-resident canvas of the Boarderless app via a structured spatial ledger.97 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, read, and traverse Markdown note vaults (Obsidian-compatible) with full-text search, backlinks, knowledge graphs, and a persistent memory system for cross-session context.168 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading, writing, searching, and surgical editing of Obsidian vault notes, tags, and frontmatter, plus workspace control, vault structure management, and native Excalidraw automation.3,187 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resource+action pairs (create/update/delete/move/arrange nodes, CRUD for links and zones, trash/archive handling). A few boundaries blur: move_nodes vs arrange_nodes vs update_nodes (which also moves/resizes), and search_nodes vs list_nodes (which takes a text query) vs get_nodes, though descriptions clarify the intended use.
Almost all tools follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_nodes, list_links, update_zone, delete_links). The main blemish is pluralization drift within the same resource (create_zone singular vs list_zones/delete_zones plural) and describe_node_kinds, but overall it is predictable and readable.
25 tools is at the heavy end for the apparent scope. The domain (nodes, links, zones, trash, archive, files, view, project) is genuinely rich and most tools earn their place, but full CRUD replicated across nodes/links/zones plus many utility verbs makes the surface feel crowded and could be consolidated.
Coverage is strong: full CRUD across nodes, links, and zones, plus trash listing/restore, import, view focus, undo, save, status, kind introspection, and list/get/search. The one notable dead end is archive handling — list_archive exists but there is no restore/unarchive operation, and no permanent delete or empty-trash.