Skip to main content
Glama
reliai-in

io.github.loopg/pramana-mcp

by reliai-in

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
PRAMANA_API_KEYYesYour Pramana engineer or admin API key. Create a key in Settings → API keys at reliai.in. Engineer or admin key is required; an auditor key will not receive recorded prompts or responses.
PRAMANA_API_URLNoOptional custom Pramana API URL for self-hosting. Set this to your own API endpoint if you are not using the default hosted API.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
list_tracesB

List recorded AI agent runs (traces) captured by Pramana, optionally filtered by agent, status or time range.

get_traceA

Get one recorded agent run: its steps, model calls, tool calls with arguments, and outcome.

list_model_diffsC

List comparison runs that checked a prompt or model change against recorded production runs.

get_model_diffB

Get the findings of one comparison run: which decisions changed behaviourally, which were cosmetic, and which runs halted.

verify_bundleB

Verify a Pramana signed evidence bundle offline, with no account and no network access.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: two list/get pairs for traces and model diffs, plus an independent offline verification tool. There is no overlap between listing, retrieving, and verifying operations, so misselection is unlikely.

Naming Consistency5/5

All five names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_traces, get_trace, list_model_diffs, get_model_diff, verify_bundle). The list/get pairing is symmetric and predictable across both resources.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools is well-scoped for an observability/inspection server with two resources plus a verification utility. Each tool earns its place with no redundant entries.

Completeness4/5

The list/get pairs cover discovery and detail for traces and diffs, and verify_bundle handles the evidence-checking lifecycle, so read workflows are complete. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no trace export or diff-creation trigger), but these are workable given the inspection-focused scope.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues