io.github.loopg/pramana-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.loopg/pramana-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables an assistant to verify whether claims about AI systems hold against supplied evidence bytes, replay conformance vectors, and inspect related terms and artifact digests offline without fetching, writing, or sending data.9Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables assistants to inspect tamper-evident AI agent action journals through read-only verification, event querying, and policy-rule explanation.97 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceLets AI assistants inspect test run results, AI QA reports, and findings with their full evidence, and, when asked, start runs, re-run only failed tests, import API specs, or scan a website. Read-only tools are free, while work-starting tools consume the workspace's allowance and report usage limits.1915 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCaptures AI agent runs and turns them into tamper-evident execution records showing tool use, timing, failures, recoveries, and human interventions. Records can be inspected, exported, and verified offline.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to analyze, cluster, compare, and export reports from local log files through seven read-only tools, returning compact evidence packs with line-number citations instead of raw log dumps. All processing happens on the local machine, so log data never leaves the environment.526 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to inspect local JUnit test-run history and failure evidence via read-only MCP tools, including run comparisons, grouped failures, test histories, and exact cited observations.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: two list/get pairs for traces and model diffs, plus an independent offline verification tool. There is no overlap between listing, retrieving, and verifying operations, so misselection is unlikely.
All five names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_traces, get_trace, list_model_diffs, get_model_diff, verify_bundle). The list/get pairing is symmetric and predictable across both resources.
Five tools is well-scoped for an observability/inspection server with two resources plus a verification utility. Each tool earns its place with no redundant entries.
The list/get pairs cover discovery and detail for traces and diffs, and verify_bundle handles the evidence-checking lifecycle, so read workflows are complete. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no trace export or diff-creation trigger), but these are workable given the inspection-focused scope.