No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct risk surface (phone, email, URL/file, wallet, MCP, domains), and the async scan tools have a clear poller companion. The only real ambiguity is among check_breach, check_infostealer, and check_prompt_injection_breach, which all take an email address but are differentiated by data source.
The set follows a consistent check_/scan_ + target convention, and check_scan_result clearly pairs with scan_url/scan_file. scan_wallet and check_domain_lookalikes deviate slightly from the expected direct-check naming, but the pattern remains predictable.
Eleven tools is a reasonable size for a security-checking server covering phone, email, URLs, files, wallets, MCP servers, and domains. Each tool represents a distinct check or required polling helper, with no obvious filler.
The surface covers the main security-check workflows end to end, including async URL/file scans paired with check_scan_result. Minor gaps exist (e.g., general domain reputation checking or historical result retrieval), but they do not create dead ends for the stated purpose.
