@ismalicious/mcp-server

A zero-dependency Model Context Protocol server that gives an AI agent isMalicious threat intelligence: reputation verdicts for IP addresses, domains, URLs, file hashes, email addresses and phone numbers, the CVE catalog, and the isinjected gate that scans untrusted content for prompt injection before the agent acts on it.

Install

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ismalicious": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@ismalicious/mcp-server"],
      "env": {
        "ISMALICIOUS_API_KEY": "your-api-key",
        "ISMALICIOUS_API_SECRET": "your-api-secret"
      }
    }
  }
}

Keys: https://ismalicious.com/app/account. Free keys exist. Without the two variables the server still starts, offering only bootstrap_key, which mints a free key from an email address and uses it for the session (see below).

Registry name: com.ismalicious/mcp-server (https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=ismalicious).

Related MCP server: Nullcone MCP Server

Tools

The default search API reads a bare keyword as its .com (paypal → paypal.com) and returns at most 500 listed lookalikes. limit only reduces that sample. Only listed domains are returned and a name buried in a longer hostname is not matched, so an empty answer does not prove that no lookalike exists. The MCP result labels total_hits_scope as upstream_sample. Legacy or custom API responses without completeness metadata produce truncated: null.

Scans and requests are two meters: https://ismalicious.com/api-docs.

Indicator types

check_indicator and check_indicators type each indicator before any request, the way the API does:

Every value is NFKC-normalised first, so full-width forms from CJK text (０９０−１２３４−５６７８, user＠evil.com, ｅｖｉｌ．ｃｏｍ) read as their ASCII selves, and an ideographic full stop (。) separates labels. Numbers are read as typeset before the phone rule applies, and that form is what is sent: no-break and thin spaces become spaces, typographic dashes and the minus sign become -, (+33) 6 … becomes +33 6 …, +44 (0)20 … loses the national (0), 030/1234567 its slash, tel: links their ;ext=… parameters, and a trailing extension (x123, ext. 123) is dropped. A contact link is read as the address or number it holds, with or without //: mailto:, tel:, sms: (and its ?body=…), callto:, and sip: when its user part is a number. So is a spreadsheet export's =+1…, ="+1…" or '+1….

Input that is none of these is refused before any request (invalid_params; in a batch, a row with an error, not sent and not charged), never sent as a domain: an @ the email rule rejects ("john doe"@example.com, user@localhost, user@evil.com/), digits and separators the phone rule rejects (12345), a number written with its keypad letters (+1-800-FLOWERS), a URL whose host is not a dotted domain or an IP (https://intranet/), and anything else that is not a hostname (localhost, *.evil.com, spaces, quotes or brackets). Sent as a domain, each came back "not listed", which read as clean / allow.

Defanged input is refanged first, and the refanged value is what is sent: hxxp(s) in any case, [.] (.) {.} [dot], [:], [@] [at], [/], surrounding brackets or quotes, a contact scheme, a display name around an address, trailing sentence punctuation. The result carries input when it differs from indicator by more than letter case.

SHA-512, SHA-384, TLSH, ssdeep and other hexadecimal strings of 32 characters or more are refused before any request (invalid_params; in a batch, a row with an error, not sent and not charged): the API indexes MD5, SHA-1 and SHA-256 only.

An email address or a phone number is never clean. The API's email and phone sources are a few feeds, so not being in them is unknown / unverified, not evidence of safety. Its verdict comes from the address or number's own listings and, for an email address, the sender domain. A listing makes it malicious when its source's confidence is 70 or more, or when two independent publishers at 60 or more agree; one list below that (the consumer-complaint number feeds and the one address blacklist sit at 55) makes it suspicious, because such lists name a displayed caller ID or From address, often forged. For an email address, a malicious domain that is not a shared mail provider makes the address malicious; a domain with threat listings, a disposable domain or a domain whose null MX says it accepts no mail makes it suspicious. Everything is read from the API's dataset and cached DNS: mx is false only for a null MX, and null when no DNS answer is cached or the cached one lists no MX. An API server that predates email and phone support answers them as domains; the result is then unknown / unverified with a note, never clean / allow.

check_indicator example

{
  "indicator": "45.148.10.242",
  "type": "ip",
  "verdict": "malicious",
  "headline": "45.148.10.242 is flagged malicious by 7 sources (scanner); risk 78/100; seen from 2026-06-02 to 2026-09-01.",
  "recommendedAction": "block",
  "malicious": true,
  "risk": { "score": 78, "level": "high" },
  "reputation": {
    "malicious": 7,
    "suspicious": 0,
    "harmless": 0,
    "undetected": 0
  },
  "blocklist": {
    "hits": 7,
    "listed": true,
    "sources": [{ "name": "…", "category": "ip" }]
  },
  "network": { "countryCode": "NL", "asn": "AS…", "org": "…" },
  "flags": {
    "delisted": false,
    "knownGood": false,
    "microsoftTenant": false,
    "ransomware": false,
    "relatedInfrastructure": true
  },
  "reportUrl": "https://ismalicious.com/report?query=45.148.10.242"
}

blocklist counts threat listings only. Listings whose threatClass is infrastructure, policy or allowlist — a cloud provider's published ranges, a Tor exit list, an ad-blocking list — say what the entity is or what a customer may choose to block, not that it attacked anyone, so they never reach the verdict. They are reported under infrastructure, which is absent when there are none:

{
  "indicator": "13.107.6.152",
  "type": "ip",
  "verdict": "clean",
  "headline": "13.107.6.152 is not listed by any threat source; known infrastructure: cloud, saas; risk 12/100.",
  "recommendedAction": "allow",
  "malicious": false,
  "risk": { "score": 12, "level": "low" },
  "blocklist": { "hits": 0, "listed": false, "sources": [] },
  "infrastructure": {
    "attributes": ["cloud", "saas"],
    "sources": [
      {
        "name": "Azure IP Ranges",
        "category": "infrastructure",
        "threatClass": "infrastructure"
      },
      {
        "name": "Microsoft 365 endpoints",
        "category": "infrastructure",
        "threatClass": "infrastructure"
      }
    ]
  },
  "network": {
    "countryCode": "US",
    "asn": "AS8075",
    "org": "Microsoft Azure Cloud (eastus2)"
  },
  "reportUrl": "https://ismalicious.com/report?query=13.107.6.152"
}

attributes is one or more of tor-exit, vpn, proxy, doh-resolver, dns-resolver, sinkhole, cloud, cdn, crawler, scanner, monitoring, disposable-email, dynamic-dns, url-shortener, bogon, saas, allowlist; new ones may appear. An indicator cited by a honeypot feed and sitting in a cloud range keeps its honeypot verdict.

Email address and phone number examples

{
  "indicator": "billing@invoices-portal.example",
  "type": "email",
  "verdict": "suspicious",
  "headline": "billing@invoices-portal.example is listed by 1 threat source (spam, scam); the domain invoices-portal.example is not in our dataset; risk 50/100.",
  "recommendedAction": "review",
  "malicious": false,
  "lookupStatus": "found",
  "risk": {
    "score": 50,
    "level": "medium",
    "summary": "billing@invoices-portal.example is on a low-confidence list: review before trusting it"
  },
  "reasons": [
    "Address listed by 1 threat feed: Sefinek - Blacklisted Emails (spam, scam, abuse)",
    "Highest source confidence 55/100: below 70, one list is not enough for a malicious verdict"
  ],
  "categories": ["spam", "scam", "abuse"],
  "blocklist": {
    "hits": 1,
    "listed": true,
    "sources": [{ "name": "Sefinek - Blacklisted Emails", "category": "spam" }]
  },
  "timeline": { "firstSeen": "2026-09-01", "lastSeen": "2026-09-29" },
  "email": {
    "domain": "invoices-portal.example",
    "disposable": false,
    "freeProvider": false,
    "mx": true,
    "domainReputation": {
      "lookupStatus": "unknown",
      "malicious": false,
      "blocklistHits": 0,
      "sources": []
    }
  },
  "flags": { "delisted": false },
  "meta": { "enrichment": "fast", "processingMs": 2, "latencyMs": 41 }
}

check_indicator with { "indicator": "06 12 34 56 78", "country": "FR" }:

{
  "indicator": "+33612345678",
  "input": "06 12 34 56 78",
  "type": "phone",
  "verdict": "unknown",
  "headline": "+33612345678 is not in any source we hold; absence is not evidence of safety.",
  "recommendedAction": "unverified",
  "malicious": false,
  "lookupStatus": "unknown",
  "risk": {
    "summary": "No evidence about +33612345678: unverified, not a clean verdict"
  },
  "reasons": [
    "No phone feed lists this number",
    "Absence from our dataset is not evidence that the number is safe"
  ],
  "blocklist": { "hits": 0, "listed": false, "sources": [] },
  "phone": {
    "e164": "+33612345678",
    "countryCallingCode": "33",
    "resolvedWith": "country"
  },
  "flags": { "delisted": false },
  "meta": { "enrichment": "fast", "processingMs": 1, "latencyMs": 38 }
}

resolvedWith is e164 (written with + or 00), country (resolved with country), nanp-guess (10 digits read as North American) or digits (no country could be told; e164 is then null).

A hash the dataset knows also carries file (family, file type, MIME type, name, size, signature, tags, the file's other digests) and lookupStatus; a citing source reached through another digest of the same file says via: "alias", one reached through a listed range via: "cidr".

A hash NSRL knows (flags.knownGood) that a threat blocklist also lists comes back suspicious with recommendedAction: "review", never malicious / block: NSRL identifies known software, it does not clear it, and the two sources disagree, which is a call for an analyst. The headline names the conflict (<sha256> is known software (NSRL), yet 2 sources list it; review before blocking.) and blocklist still lists the citing sources. check_indicators relays each row's recommendedAction from the API as it comes; its rows carry no NSRL flag.

check_indicators returns its rows in input order. When the result would pass 48 KB, whole rows are dropped from the end and the result says so with returned, omitted, truncated: true and a note; malicious still counts every row, split into maliciousReturned and maliciousOmitted. search_indicators does the same with indicators past 32 KB.

Errors

Every failure is a result with isError: true and this body:

{
  "error": "rate_limited",
  "status": 429,
  "message": "Rate limit exceeded",
  "quota": {
    "kind": "burst",
    "limit": 60,
    "remaining": 0,
    "plan": "FREE",
    "retry_after": 30,
    "resets_at": "…"
  },
  "hint": "Wait 30s before retrying."
}

error is one of rate_limited, unauthorized, forbidden, not_found, bad_request, upstream_error, timeout, network_error, invalid_params. quota.kind is burst, monthly, daily, scans or issuance. A 401 says whether no key is configured or the configured one was refused.

Timeouts and cancellation

Gate tools 15 s, check_indicator 25 s, CVE tools 10 s, search_indicators 20 s, check_indicators 60 s, check_password_exposure 10 s, bootstrap_key 15 s. ISMALICIOUS_TIMEOUT_MS replaces all of them; ISMALICIOUS_TIMEOUT_<TOOL>_MS (for example ISMALICIOUS_TIMEOUT_CHECK_INDICATOR_MS=3000) sets one tool's and wins. A notifications/cancelled from the client aborts the HTTP call; the cancelled request gets no response.

Latency

What the server itself does to answer sooner:

• fast enrichment is check_indicator's default: the API answers from cached intelligence without calling a live upstream first. Facets it did not have cached are listed in meta.pending and fetched in the background; only then does the headline ask for one re-check after a few seconds, and it says that a facet still pending after it is not coming (the answer stands; each re-check is a billed request). A hash no source has cached may still wait a few seconds on CIRCL before the answer. standard may call DNS, OTX or CIRCL before answering. fast needs an API deploy from 2026-09-30 or later: an older server reads it as standard for an IP, a domain or a URL, but stores enrichmentLevel: "fast" in the hash document it caches, which is why this release follows that deploy. Email addresses and phone numbers are answered from cached data at every level.

• Connection reuse: one keep-alive pool per scheme (16 sockets, idle sockets kept 30 s), gzip or brotli responses, so a call a few seconds after the previous one does not pay a new TCP and TLS handshake. After initialize, when a key is set, one unauthenticated GET /health opens the connection before the first tool call (ISMALICIOUS_PREWARM=0 to skip).

• Result cache: a successful result is replayed to an identical call — same key, tool and normalised arguments — for 60 s (check_indicator, check_indicators, check_url), 1 h (get_cve) or 5 min (recent_cves, search_indicators). A result that lists pending facets is never replayed: the re-check it invites goes to the API. A replay costs no request and says so (meta.cached, meta.ageSec, or a top-level _cache). scan_before_use, bootstrap_key and errors are never cached. ISMALICIOUS_CACHE_TTL_S caps or (with 0) disables it.

• Shared calls: identical calls in flight share one request, a result with pending facets included. A defanged and a plain form of one indicator are one call; each caller still gets its own input.

meta.latencyMs on a check_indicator result is the client-measured round trip; meta.processingMs is the API's own time.

Calling the API host directly

By default the server calls https://ismalicious.com/api, which forwards to the API. Setting ISMALICIOUS_API_BASE=https://api.ismalicious.com calls the API host directly and skips that hop. bootstrap_key still goes to https://ismalicious.com/api (its route exists only there; see ISMALICIOUS_WEB_BASE). One billing difference: on the API host search_indicators is charged one request of the monthly quota, where the default base only counts it against the burst rate limit.

Resource

ismalicious://quota (application/json): the scan meter from GET /gate/quota and the request-quota headers seen on the last billed call of this session.

Environment

Development

npm install
npm run typecheck && npm test && npm run build
node scripts/check-version.mjs   # versions and server.json shape
node scripts/smoke.mjs           # stdio end-to-end against a stub API

The version is declared once in src/version.ts; CHANGELOG.md lists what changed. This repository mirrors packages/mcp-server from the isMalicious monorepo, where releases to npm and the MCP registry are cut. Issues and pull requests are welcome here.

The Dockerfile is the build Glama runs to list the server. It sets a placeholder key pair so tools/list shows every tool; pass a real pair with docker run -i -e ISMALICIOUS_API_KEY=… -e ISMALICIOUS_API_SECRET=…, or empty values for bootstrap mode.