Skip to main content
Glama

reddit_user_submitted

Read-only

List a Reddit user's submitted posts to see what they post rather than only what they comment on. Returns title, score, comment count, permalink, and a pagination cursor.

Instructions

List a Reddit user's submitted POSTS (their post history, the sibling of reddit_user_comments). Returns posts with title, author, score, comment count, and permalink, plus an after cursor. Use to see what a redditor posts, not just what they comment on. Example: name='spez' sort='top'.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tNoTime window, only applied when sort is 'top' or 'controversial'. E.g. 'week' = top of the past week. Ignored for other sorts.
nameYesReddit username WITHOUT the u/ prefix (e.g. 'spez'). Required (path parameter).
sortNoSort order for a user's comments. 'new' = most recent (default), 'hot', 'top' (in the `t` window), 'controversial'.
afterNoOpaque pagination cursor. Pass back the previous response's `after` value EXACTLY as it was returned; the format is not stable and a hand-written Reddit fullname loses the paging depth the cursor carries. Omit on the first call. When `after` comes back null there is no next page to request, and that does NOT reliably mean you have every item: Reddit often stops serving a busy listing long before it runs out. Read `listing_status` on that final response instead. It is `complete`, `truncated` or `unknown`, and ONLY `complete` means nothing is missing. Never report `truncated` or `unknown` to a user as the end of the data; say the answer is partial and widen across sorts, timeframes or search terms.
limitNoMax items to return (1 to 100). The API clamps out-of-range values; endpoint default applies if omitted.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.3
    • changedInput schema / properties / after / description
      Previous value: -"Opaque Reddit pagination cursor from the previous response's `after` field (a fullname like `t3_abc123`). Omit on the first call; pass it to fetch the next page."New value: +"Opaque pagination cursor. Pass back the previous response's `after` value EXACTLY as it was returned; the format is not stable and a hand-written Reddit fullname loses the paging depth the cursor carries. Omit on the first call. When `after` comes back null there is no next page to request, and that does NOT reliably mean you have every item: Reddit often stops serving a busy listing long before it runs out. Read `listing_status` on that final response instead. It is `complete`, `truncated` or `unknown`, and ONLY `complete` means nothing is missing. Never report `truncated` or `unknown` to a user as the end of the data; say the answer is partial and widen across sorts, timeframes or search terms."
  2. First observedv0.1.12

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations cover the safety profile (readOnly, openWorld, non-destructive), so the description is free to add functional detail: it enumerates returned fields (title, author, score, comment count, permalink) and mentions the `after` cursor, which matters because there is no output schema. It doesn't restate the truncation caveat beyond pointing at the cursor, but the schema's `after` description already carries that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the verb and resource, then the sibling distinction, then an example. No filler and nothing buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully names the returned fields and the pagination cursor, which is exactly what an agent needs to interpret responses. It could go slightly further on how the `listing_status` field affects downstream reporting, but that detail lives in the schema param.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so `t`, `name`, `sort`, `after` and `limit` are all documented in the schema itself. The description only adds a single example (`name='spez' sort='top'`), which is a baseline-level supplement rather than new semantic content.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a precise verb+resource (list a user's submitted POSTS) and explicitly positions itself against the sibling reddit_user_comments as 'the sibling of reddit_user_comments'. An agent can distinguish the two without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use to see what a redditor posts, not just what they comment on' gives a clear selection condition versus the comment-listing sibling, reinforced by a concrete example call. It stops short of naming other alternatives (e.g. reddit_search, reddit_subreddit_posts) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.