Skip to main content
Glama

reddit_monitor_health

Read-only

Check a Reddit monitor's health: activity, cadence, delivery counts, 24h coverage and stream liveness, to spot stale withholds, gaps or stalled feeds.

Instructions

Per-monitor health: whether it's active, its poll cadence, when it last matched something, and delivery counts for the last 24h (delivered_24h, failed_24h, suppressed_24h) plus whether its delivery ceiling has been hit (ceiling_reached) and what that ceiling is (daily_delivery_ceiling). suppressed_24h COUNTS TWO DIFFERENT THINGS AND suppressed_breakdown SPLITS THEM: ceiling (the monitor's daily cap was reached) and stale (the item was already older than the freshness window when we first saw it, so it was withheld rather than delivered as if it were new). A stale withhold is the usual reason a monitor's delivered count sits far below its matched count with no error anywhere, and it is the freshness gate working as intended -- nothing failed, the endpoint is fine, no limit on the plan rejected them, and retrying cannot recover the items. Do NOT read suppressed_24h > 0 as 'this monitor is over its limit': ceiling_reached is the field that answers that, and a stale withhold deliberately does not set it. When suppressed_breakdown.resolved is false the counts do not add up to the total and unresolved_reason says why, so do not report a split off them; ceiling_reached stays conservative in that case rather than being cleared. THOSE COUNTS ONLY COVER POSTS WE FETCHED. A post we never fetched was never matched and leaves no row behind, so it is absent from all three counters rather than counted in any of them -- zeros there mean 'no matches recorded', never 'nothing was missed'. coverage_24h is the separate field that speaks to fetching, and its status is the one to read first: complete (every poll reached the point where the previous poll finished), degraded (at least one poll was truncated and posts were lost unrecoverably -- see gaps[], posts_in_window_at_least and the estimated posts_missed_estimate), partial (nothing found, but not every kind of loss was checked -- see unobserved_events), or unknown (the check could not be run at all -- see reason). Do NOT report a monitor as healthy on unknown or partial, and do not treat a null count as zero: both mean the question went unanswered. coverage_24h is fed by the poll log and covers BOTH ways a poll loses posts unrecoverably (listing_exhausted, where Reddit stopped serving older posts, and poll_overflow, where the feed outran one poll's page budget); observed_events names what was actually checked, and a status of complete is only ever awarded when both were. WHAT complete DOES AND DOES NOT ESTABLISH: it means every poll that RAN got back to where the previous poll finished, AND that every feed was actually polled. The second half is stream_liveness, the field to read FIRST. coverage_24h is computed from the poll log, and a feed that is never polled writes nothing to that log, so it records no truncated poll and the coverage read comes back clean -- identical to a healthy monitor. stream_liveness reads a different source (the polling registry plus the per-feed last-successful-poll stamp), neither of which a poll that never ran can produce. Its status is live (every feed checked within three times its own interval), degraded (at least one is not: see streams[] for never_polled, stalled or unregistered per feed), or unknown (could not be established, including streams_awaiting_first_poll on a monitor created moments ago, which clears itself). coverage_24h can never read complete while this is anything but live. Do NOT report a monitor as healthy unless stream_liveness.status is live, and do not read a zero delivery count on a never_polled feed as a quiet subreddit: nothing was checked, so nothing could match. gaps[] IS A SAMPLE, NOT THE WHOLE LIST: it carries the most recent gaps only, gaps_returned says how many are in it, gaps_truncated says whether more exist, and gap_events_24h is always the true total. Count gaps from gap_events_24h and never from the length of gaps[]. FINALLY, cadence ANSWERS 'AM I BEING CHECKED AS OFTEN AS I PAY TO BE', which none of the fields above can. Cadence is a priced feature, so this is the field that says whether the monitor is being served the interval its plan sells. promised_cadence_s is the floor the account's CURRENT plan includes and requested_cadence_s is what this monitor is actually set to; meets_entitlement false means the monitor is set slower than the plan allows, which happens because a plan upgrade does NOT re-cadence monitors that already exist -- the fix is to set cadence_s on the monitor, and a deliberately slower cadence is also a legitimate choice. last_checked_s_ago, freshness_ratio and within_margin describe the slowest feed feeding this monitor, named in slowest_stream. READ freshness_reading BEFORE QUOTING ANY OF THEM: it is ONE INSTANTANEOUS SAMPLE, not an average and not a sustained verdict, so a single reading past the margin is not by itself proof of under-service. Every one of these is TRI-STATE and null NEVER means fine: a null within_margin or meets_entitlement means the question could not be answered, and unknown_reason says why. Do not report a monitor as on-cadence on a null.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe monitor's id, from reddit_monitor_add's response or reddit_monitor_list.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.5.3

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds deep operational context beyond that: stale withhold behavior, what complete does and does not establish, tri-state null semantics, and the fact that a never-polled feed writes nothing to the poll log. It stops short of describing output shape or pagination, but the behavioral disclosures are unusually rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a dense wall of capitalized warnings and nested caveats that repeatedly restate the same exclusion (three separate 'do not report healthy on unknown/partial/live' variants). The field taxonomy is useful but the prose is roughly 5-10x the necessary length for a single-parameter read tool, and front-loading is sacrificed to exhaustiveness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only health-check tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description carries the full burden of interpreting the returned fields, and it does so completely: every status enum is defined (complete/degraded/partial/unknown, live/degraded/unknown), every counter's meaning is explained, and the tri-state null semantics are explicitly stated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (id), schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already points at reddit_monitor_add and reddit_monitor_list as sources. The description adds no parameter-level detail, so baseline sits at 4 for a single-parameter tool with fully documented schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb+resource and a precise scope: per-monitor health covering active state, cadence, last match, and 24h delivery counts. The taxonomy of returned fields (coverage_24h, stream_liveness, cadence, gaps) is laid out exhausively, which distinguishes it sharply from reddit_monitor_list and reddit_monitor_deliveries without opening those schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when/when-not guidance throughout: do not report healthy on unknown/partial status, do not report healthy unless stream_liveness.status is live, read stream_liveness first, read freshness_reading before quoting. It also explains the diagnostic hierarchy (stream_liveness before coverage_24h) and names the fix path (set cadence_s).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.