list_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explains the output structure and the meaning of the 'installed' flag, including the .missing suffix behavior when an image is missing. This provides valuable context beyond what is expected from a simple listing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and effectively structured: the first sentence states the action, and the second explains the return structure. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple listing tool with no parameters and an output schema. The description fully covers what the tool returns and the special case of missing images, making it complete for an agent to invoke without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema is empty, so the baseline for parameter semantics is 4. The description adds no parameter-specific information, but none is needed; it instead explains the output structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List installed node templates') and the resource ('node templates'), and further specifies the structured entry format. It distinguishes from siblings like list_network_types and get_template by focusing on installed node templates, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by noting the template id is 'usable in add_node', hinting that this tool is for discovering template ids. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_template or list_images, nor does it mention any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.