console_close

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the transparency burden. It discloses a key behavior (closing all sessions when node_id is None), but does not mention side effects, idempotency, or error behavior. For a simple close tool, the critical behavior is stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler. The action and conditional behavior are front-loaded, and the usage tip is concise. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, and the description covers the purpose, the special None case, and when to use it. Since an output schema exists, return values need not be explained. It omits prerequisites or irreversibility, but these are less critical for a close operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description fully explains the single parameter: node_id identifies the node, and None means all sessions. This directly compensates for the schema gap, adding meaningful semantics beyond the raw type/default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Close') and resource ('a node's console session'), and clearly distinguishes the all-sessions case when node_id is None. This differentiates it from sibling tools like console_send and console_read.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear contextual guidance with 'Good practice once you are done configuring a node.' It does not explicitly mention when not to use or name alternatives, but the timing is unambiguous and no exclusion is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.