Skip to main content
Glama
rakib-nyc

taxcite

by rakib-nyc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to taxcite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Citation Safe

      andrewjgaber-commits
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic legal citation verification for AI-generated legal briefs. Three-layer verification: CourtListener database lookup, quote-match against primary source, and LLM edge-case verification. Free tier available.
      -

    • io.github.mgdsn/verify-api-mcp

      mgdsn
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify whether citations exist and match canonical records, and whether URLs resolve and contain expected content, with evidence-backed confirmed, contradicted, or unknown verdicts.
      2
      66 PyPI
      MIT
    • kvasir-legal by kvasir-legal

      kvasir-legalofficial

      kvasir-legal
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Verifiable German, Austrian, Swiss and EU law: resolve citations to the wording in force, verify the citations a model produced against the official source, and walk the citation graph.
      -

    • taxax-legal-mcp

      JHP0418
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic research of Korean tax-law issues by retrieving and scoring official statutory evidence from law.go.kr and other legal sources, with citation verification and provenance, without deciding legal conclusions.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the tax-research/verification workflow, and the descriptions clearly separate them. The only mild boundary cases are get_cross_references vs reading_closure and check_case vs verify_citations, but the descriptions make those distinctions usable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names mostly follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern like get_irc_provision, search_tax_law, and list_subdivisions. reading_closure breaks the verb-first pattern slightly, but the naming is otherwise predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a tax-law research and citation-verification server. Each tool contributes to a coherent workflow without redundant entries.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core lifecycle well: fetching law, searching, resolving citations, verifying quotations, checking cross-references, comparing versions, and assessing authority. Minor gaps exist for full case-opinion retrieval or administrative guidance, but these do not create dead ends for the apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources