Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to universal-jev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to make structured local decisions, choose bounded browser actions with approvals, and run coding workflows such as file relevance, context pruning, diff screening, and completion checks through MCP or CLI.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic context compaction and safety gating for AI agents, preserving original messages verbatim while dropping irrelevant ones and flagging destructive commands.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to resolve routine typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally instead of invoking a frontier LLM, returning schema-enforced decision outputs and telemetry at sub-millisecond latency. Also provides reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decay-based episodic memory for safe, privacy-preserving autonomous operation.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to make cheap, fast probabilistic decisions on every turn, with tools for coding-loop checks, review, verification, screening untrusted input, and ranking candidates.
      6
      470 npm
      61
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables governed tool-calling agents with policy decisions, optional human approval, hash-chained audit logging, and deterministic evaluation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to resolve typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally at sub-millisecond latency, avoiding unnecessary frontier LLM calls. It enforces reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decayed episodic memory for safe, privacy-first autonomous operation.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: compaction, guard, status, and three decision types that differ in output format (classification, boolean, score). The decide_* tools are clearly differentiated by their suffixes and descriptions, leaving no genuine ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the 'jev_' prefix followed by snake_case verbs and descriptive modifiers (compact, decide_choice, decide_noul, decide_score, guard, status). The pattern is uniform and predictable, with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range, providing a focused utility set without redundancy or bloat. Each tool earns its place for the server's stated purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core utility needs: compaction, guardrails, status monitoring, and three decision modalities. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no configuration tool or free-form generation), but these are likely outside the intended scope and do not create dead ends for typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues