Skip to main content
Glama
rafavillaplana

Bing Webmaster Tools MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bing Webmaster Tools MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to query Google Search Console performance data, inspect URL indexing status, submit URLs via IndexNow, and check title and meta-description lengths against Bing limits directly in chat.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Bing Webmaster Tools and IndexNow for AI agents: traffic, indexing, crawl issues, inbound links, keywords. Direct writes are off by default; changes go through a plan a person applies.
      63
      287 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP clients to read Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools data, analyze query/page performance, compare periods, inspect indexing and canonical status, and retrieve sitemap and keyword statistics.
      23
      2,007 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents full access to Bing Webmaster Tools API for site management, URL submission, sitemaps, traffic stats, keyword research, and URL blocking.
      24
      8 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying Google Search Console data, including search analytics, indexing status, and sitemap management, through natural language conversations with Claude.
      94 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Bing Webmaster Tools, including site verification, URL submissions, traffic analytics, crawl monitoring, and keyword analysis through natural language.
      62
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct dimension (queries, pages, crawls, links, sitemaps, trends), and descriptions explicitly disambiguate the risky pairs like get_query_stats vs get_queries_for_page and get_page_stats vs get_pages_for_query. The only mild overlap is get_inbound_links vs get_inbound_link_counts (per-URL link detail vs per-page counts) and get_url_info vs get_url_traffic_info, but both pairs are still distinguishable from their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, overwhelmingly get_* with a single list_sites. The noun phrases are descriptive and predictable across the whole set.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly above the ideal range for a single-domain server, but the domain (a full webmaster analytics API) is broad and each tool maps to a distinct report or entity. None feel like filler, so it justifies its weight without being bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across analytics (queries, pages, trends), crawl diagnostics, sitemaps, links, and keyword research. The main gap is action-oriented operations like URL submission and sitemap submission: get_url_submission_quota hints at submission but no submit tool exists, leaving a write-side dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues