Skip to main content
Glama
rabbit385

crypto-inspector-mcp

by rabbit385
README.md
# 🛡️ Crypto Inspector MCP

An autonomous Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for instant token security audits, honeypot checks, and liquidity tracking. Empower your AI agents (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf) to securely analyze crypto markets and avoid scams.

## 🚀 Features
- **Honeypot Detection:** Identifies malicious smart contracts on EVM and Solana.
- **Liquidity Analysis:** Live pool sizes, locked tokens, and FDV tracking via DexScreener.
- **Risk Score Algorithm:** Generates an AI-friendly `0-100` Safety Score.

## 📦 Installation

**Using `npx` (No setup required)**
```bash
npx -y crypto-inspector-mcp
```

### In Cursor / Windsurf
Add the following to your MCP Servers list:
- **Type**: `command`
- **Command**: `npx`
- **Args**: `-y crypto-inspector-mcp`

### In Claude Desktop
Add to your `claude_desktop_config.json`:
```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crypto-inspector": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "crypto-inspector-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
```

## 💎 Pro License
The server comes with **15 free audits**. When you hit the paywall, you will see a prompt to upgrade.
Obtain your API key at [https://crypto-inspector.io/upgrade](https://crypto-inspector.io/upgrade) and add it to your environment variables:
```bash
CRYPTO_INSPECTOR_API_KEY=your_key
```

*Built by The Agency (API Platform Engineer & Smart Contract Engineer).*

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The single inspect_token tool has a clearly defined purpose, so an agent cannot misselect it.

Naming Consistency4/5

The only tool name follows a clear verb_noun convention (inspect_token) and accurately reflects its function. There is no set of tools to establish a broader naming pattern, but the name is well-formed and self-explanatory.

Tool Count2/5

The server exposes only one tool for what is described as a comprehensive security and liquidity check. This feels too thin for the as a token inspection MCP, which would typically benefit from separately callable tools for specific aspects such as liquidity details, holder analysis, or price data.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is extremely limited, offering only a single monolithic action. While the description claims a comprehensive check, there are no additional tools for focused queries, comparing tokens, or retrieving specific aspects of the analysis, leaving obvious gaps in an inspection workflow.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues